Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

"Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
17 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

    "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

    https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan/en_US/resources/datasheets/defenders-guide-to-frontier-ai-checklist-for-cisos

    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
    epic_null@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @jerry OSS can be audited. I think that scares these companies most of all.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

      "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

      https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan/en_US/resources/datasheets/defenders-guide-to-frontier-ai-checklist-for-cisos

      fencepost@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
      fencepost@infosec.exchangeF This user is from outside of this forum
      fencepost@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @jerry it's not entirely out of line to simply "assume compromise" for any software (or the hardware it controls, Palo Alto) but it is indeed a deep hole. AI tools may actually make problems in open source "shallow" in ways not visible or verifiable in closed systems - and while the open source projects may not be able to buy expensive tooling people looking for things to brag about may spend their own money on those tools anyway.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • exception@mastodon.savvy.chE exception@mastodon.savvy.ch

        @jerry Assume you will never now just how deeply all closed source software is compromised.

        varx@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        varx@defcon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
        varx@defcon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @exception @jerry only way to be secure is to code it yourself using punch cards. Make sure to punch the holes yourself using a lot of force. Don't want a hanging chad to introduce a hidden vulnerability!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

          "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

          https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan/en_US/resources/datasheets/defenders-guide-to-frontier-ai-checklist-for-cisos

          sempf@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
          sempf@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
          sempf@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @jerry Whelp. Everyone convert those Linux AWS containers to Windows.

          jerry@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sempf@infosec.exchangeS sempf@infosec.exchange

            @jerry Whelp. Everyone convert those Linux AWS containers to Windows.

            jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jerry@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @Sempf it's the only choice

            fennix@infosec.spaceF darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

              @Sempf it's the only choice

              fennix@infosec.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
              fennix@infosec.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
              fennix@infosec.space
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @jerry @Sempf

              I'm going to be moving forward with my very own bespoke vibecoded OS. No way the hackers can plant anything in it if even I have no clue what's in there!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

                https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan/en_US/resources/datasheets/defenders-guide-to-frontier-ai-checklist-for-cisos

                hamishthepiper@ioc.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                hamishthepiper@ioc.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                hamishthepiper@ioc.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @jerry Let’s see how long anything lasts after ripping out curl, ffmpeg, etc b/c it _might_ be an attack surface.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                  "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

                  https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan/en_US/resources/datasheets/defenders-guide-to-frontier-ai-checklist-for-cisos

                  sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundew@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundew@beige.party
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @jerry "See, if you can read the source code, you should just assume it's compromised, but if you _can't_ read the source code, that's how you know it's good." 🤪🤡

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                    @Sempf it's the only choice

                    darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    darkuncle@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    @jerry @Sempf given how much commercial software (from Palo Alto and Microsoft, among others) depends on OSS somewhere in the dev toolchain, assume *all software* is compromised

                    it's the only way to be sure.

                    paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                      "Assume OSS is compromised" - that is a very very deep hole indeed

                      https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan/en_US/resources/datasheets/defenders-guide-to-frontier-ai-checklist-for-cisos

                      lee_holmes@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lee_holmes@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lee_holmes@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @jerry I should be in marketing. "In this new world of frontier AI, <copy and paste the same generic security advice that's been given for decades like zero-trust and inventory your assets>"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD darkuncle@infosec.exchange

                        @jerry @Sempf given how much commercial software (from Palo Alto and Microsoft, among others) depends on OSS somewhere in the dev toolchain, assume *all software* is compromised

                        it's the only way to be sure.

                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                        paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @darkuncle @jerry @Sempf

                        "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

                        darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • paul_ipv6@infosec.exchangeP paul_ipv6@infosec.exchange

                          @darkuncle @jerry @Sempf

                          "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."

                          darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                          darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                          darkuncle@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @paul_ipv6 @jerry @Sempf precisely

                          sempf@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • darkuncle@infosec.exchangeD darkuncle@infosec.exchange

                            @paul_ipv6 @jerry @Sempf precisely

                            sempf@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sempf@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sempf@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            @darkuncle @paul_ipv6 @jerry I'm pretty sure that's what the rocketbois have in mind.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups