Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura.

I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
47 Posts 38 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

    I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

    msdropbear42@farcebook.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
    msdropbear42@farcebook.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
    msdropbear42@farcebook.space
    wrote last edited by
    #15
    @jerry you need to plot all accounts in a formal statistical #ControlChart, in which you determine via statistical analysis the upper & lower control limits, which for instance you might set at mean aura + three std devs for the UCL, & ofc mean aura - three std devs for the LCL. then as the data keeps accruing over time, you note those accounts tending dangerously near the UCL or LCL, but you only need take official action once an account's data line has exceeded the UCL or LCL for seven consecutive samples, as that denotes statistically significant system change in that account. once identified, urgent decisive action is required by you, lest other accounts also get uppity [or lowerly].
    jerry@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

      I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

      terryhancock@realsocial.lifeT This user is from outside of this forum
      terryhancock@realsocial.lifeT This user is from outside of this forum
      terryhancock@realsocial.life
      wrote last edited by
      #16

      @jerry

      ...It's a special substance. You gotta pray for that, man...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

        I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

        jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jerry@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #17

        “Sir, your aura is clocking in at a 13.5 and we’re gonna need you to bring it down to about a 3 if you want to stay. Thanks.”

        airshipper@cloudisland.nzA jbaggs@infosec.exchangeJ nocturnalnessa@infosec.exchangeN sheep_overboard@infosec.exchangeS securitywriter@infosec.exchangeS 7 Replies Last reply
        0
        • msdropbear42@farcebook.spaceM msdropbear42@farcebook.space
          @jerry you need to plot all accounts in a formal statistical #ControlChart, in which you determine via statistical analysis the upper & lower control limits, which for instance you might set at mean aura + three std devs for the UCL, & ofc mean aura - three std devs for the LCL. then as the data keeps accruing over time, you note those accounts tending dangerously near the UCL or LCL, but you only need take official action once an account's data line has exceeded the UCL or LCL for seven consecutive samples, as that denotes statistically significant system change in that account. once identified, urgent decisive action is required by you, lest other accounts also get uppity [or lowerly].
          jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jerry@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #18

          @msdropbear42 It makes sense. Am I taking readings with a thermometer?

          msdropbear42@farcebook.spaceM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

            “Sir, your aura is clocking in at a 13.5 and we’re gonna need you to bring it down to about a 3 if you want to stay. Thanks.”

            airshipper@cloudisland.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
            airshipper@cloudisland.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
            airshipper@cloudisland.nz
            wrote last edited by
            #19

            @jerry can i burst my aura tint? like, if i just need to vent about something?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

              I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

              zcutlip@hachyderm.ioZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zcutlip@hachyderm.ioZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zcutlip@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #20

              @jerry What are infosec.exchange’s community rules around bad auras? If someone with a bad aura signed up knowing bad auras are not allowed per instance rules against bad auras, your hands are tied ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              jerry@infosec.exchangeJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • zcutlip@hachyderm.ioZ zcutlip@hachyderm.io

                @jerry What are infosec.exchange’s community rules around bad auras? If someone with a bad aura signed up knowing bad auras are not allowed per instance rules against bad auras, your hands are tied ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

                jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jerry@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jerry@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #21

                @zcutlip see, that’s the other problem. I completely failed at accounting for auras when I created the instance rules. I have learned something today so will have to make some changes.

                zcutlip@hachyderm.ioZ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                  “Sir, your aura is clocking in at a 13.5 and we’re gonna need you to bring it down to about a 3 if you want to stay. Thanks.”

                  jbaggs@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jbaggs@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jbaggs@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #22

                  @jerry It's the flaring, isn't it? It sometimes gets a little bursty around the edges.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                    @zcutlip see, that’s the other problem. I completely failed at accounting for auras when I created the instance rules. I have learned something today so will have to make some changes.

                    zcutlip@hachyderm.ioZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zcutlip@hachyderm.ioZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zcutlip@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #23

                    @jerry infosec.aura represents a fresh start and an ideal opportunity to put these difficult lessons into practice

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                      I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

                      0xmrtn@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                      0xmrtn@infosec.exchange0 This user is from outside of this forum
                      0xmrtn@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #24

                      @jerry i'm sure the inquisition has some ideas on that topic

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                        “Sir, your aura is clocking in at a 13.5 and we’re gonna need you to bring it down to about a 3 if you want to stay. Thanks.”

                        nocturnalnessa@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nocturnalnessa@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nocturnalnessa@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #25

                        @jerry i was gonna make a joke about ai powered aurometers but then i realized they basically exist and they suck

                        lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                          I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

                          christoff@yem.bouncingaroundtheroom.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
                          christoff@yem.bouncingaroundtheroom.onlineC This user is from outside of this forum
                          christoff@yem.bouncingaroundtheroom.online
                          wrote last edited by
                          #26

                          @jerry curious if it is purple (almost famous reference)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                            @msdropbear42 It makes sense. Am I taking readings with a thermometer?

                            msdropbear42@farcebook.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                            msdropbear42@farcebook.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                            msdropbear42@farcebook.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #27
                            @jerry indeed yes, but also best practice would dictate also with a piezo-electric vibration transducer, coz in dangerous matters like these, it's "the vibe" that's really important!
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • nocturnalnessa@infosec.exchangeN nocturnalnessa@infosec.exchange

                              @jerry i was gonna make a joke about ai powered aurometers but then i realized they basically exist and they suck

                              lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote last edited by
                              #28

                              @NocturnalNessa @jerry "get the good aurometer, the one from the safe. 13.5? not great, not terrible."

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                                I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

                                viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                                viss@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #29

                                @jerry how many tasers you got?

                                moritzdietz@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                                  I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

                                  fembot@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fembot@mstdn.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fembot@mstdn.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #30

                                  @jerry Auracoders at the gates.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • theru@infosec.exchangeT theru@infosec.exchange

                                    @jerry you need to look at the account through a Quartz stone then you should be able to see it’s aura and determine if it’s bad.

                                    osma@mas.toO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    osma@mas.toO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    osma@mas.to
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #31

                                    Some indeed say you can eyeball the aura quality through quartz, but the scientific method is to measure the total harmonic distortion of the quartz vibe in the presence of the aura.
                                    @theru @jerry

                                    msdropbear@friendica.opensocial.spaceM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • osma@mas.toO osma@mas.to

                                      Some indeed say you can eyeball the aura quality through quartz, but the scientific method is to measure the total harmonic distortion of the quartz vibe in the presence of the aura.
                                      @theru @jerry

                                      msdropbear@friendica.opensocial.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      msdropbear@friendica.opensocial.spaceM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      msdropbear@friendica.opensocial.space
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #32

                                      @osma @jerry @theru

                                      the scientific method is always best! 🤪

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                                        I got an unironic report that an account has a bad aura. Now I’m not going to discount the possibility of this being true, but I’m curious how to measure whether an account’s aura has strayed too far from a good baseline aura.

                                        sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        sabik@rants.au
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #33

                                        @jerry
                                        My aura is 3M

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jerry@infosec.exchangeJ jerry@infosec.exchange

                                          “Sir, your aura is clocking in at a 13.5 and we’re gonna need you to bring it down to about a 3 if you want to stay. Thanks.”

                                          sheep_overboard@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sheep_overboard@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          sheep_overboard@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #34

                                          @jerry

                                          I don't think it's related to this, but you never know.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups