Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Hetzner, which many instances rely on, just announced a major across the board price hike.

Hetzner, which many instances rely on, just announced a major across the board price hike.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
mastoadminhetzner
36 Posts 30 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jeff@mainely.socialJ jeff@mainely.social

    Hetzner, which many instances rely on, just announced a major across the board price hike. A 30% increase isn’t minor.

    For larger companies it’s a budget line. For small Mastodon instances, it’s the line between sustainable and underwater.

    When servers jump from €49.99 to €64.99 and storage rises too, admins feel it first. Many already subsidize costs.

    Some will downsize. Some may shut down.

    Decentralization still runs on invoices.

    Support your instances.

    #Mastoadmin #Hetzner

    katharta@quietzero.netK This user is from outside of this forum
    katharta@quietzero.netK This user is from outside of this forum
    katharta@quietzero.net
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @jeff F... I was just about to make the jump

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kate@is.beeping.petK kate@is.beeping.pet
      @jeff Why would only mastodon admins suffer from this? Hosts of other fedi software should experience similar issues. ​​
      k4t3@comp.lain.laK This user is from outside of this forum
      k4t3@comp.lain.laK This user is from outside of this forum
      k4t3@comp.lain.la
      wrote last edited by
      #28
      @kate @jeff because mastodon is bloat
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lizbian@chaos.socialL lizbian@chaos.social

        @Bebef @jeff Hetzner isn't the only hoster which is increasing prices. I think Hetzner was just the first to communicate this decision. The reason behind it seems to be the RAM shortage induced by AI companies buying up all the supply.

        Moving to cheaper providers will come with less quality (more downtime, worse support, ...). And I'm also pretty sure that US-based companies aren't an option for most instances.

        bebef@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bebef@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        bebef@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @lizbian @jeff So what you're saying is that Hetzner is the cheapest provider with acceptable quality there is?

        lizbian@chaos.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jeff@mainely.socialJ jeff@mainely.social

          Hetzner, which many instances rely on, just announced a major across the board price hike. A 30% increase isn’t minor.

          For larger companies it’s a budget line. For small Mastodon instances, it’s the line between sustainable and underwater.

          When servers jump from €49.99 to €64.99 and storage rises too, admins feel it first. Many already subsidize costs.

          Some will downsize. Some may shut down.

          Decentralization still runs on invoices.

          Support your instances.

          #Mastoadmin #Hetzner

          caffetino@social.pikaia.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
          caffetino@social.pikaia.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
          caffetino@social.pikaia.org
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @jeff we're all going to have to relearn thrifty programming. The time of abundance is over. At least for now.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bebef@mastodon.socialB bebef@mastodon.social

            @lizbian @jeff So what you're saying is that Hetzner is the cheapest provider with acceptable quality there is?

            lizbian@chaos.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lizbian@chaos.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lizbian@chaos.social
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @Bebef @jeff "Acceptable quality" highly depends on use case. Also, there are other factors that limit possible providers, like datacenter location, jurisdiction(s), GDPR compliance level, available features, type of hosting, and the like.

            So yes, for some organisations, Hetzner is the cheapest option with acceptable quality that they can use.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jeff@mainely.socialJ jeff@mainely.social

              Hetzner, which many instances rely on, just announced a major across the board price hike. A 30% increase isn’t minor.

              For larger companies it’s a budget line. For small Mastodon instances, it’s the line between sustainable and underwater.

              When servers jump from €49.99 to €64.99 and storage rises too, admins feel it first. Many already subsidize costs.

              Some will downsize. Some may shut down.

              Decentralization still runs on invoices.

              Support your instances.

              #Mastoadmin #Hetzner

              drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
              drewtowler@mas.toD This user is from outside of this forum
              drewtowler@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @jeff As someone working in infosec, Hetzner IP addresses are the source of so much DoS traffic that I regard Hetzner as one big attack vector and I block their IP ranges frequently. If the prices rises mean a few less attackers, then I'm all for it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • mdione@en.osm.townM mdione@en.osm.town

                @jeff I wonder how much storage is media that nobody sees. Maybe it would be worth to add a delay in showing the media by only downloading whatever is actually seen. #Mastodon

                anlomedad@fedifreu.deA This user is from outside of this forum
                anlomedad@fedifreu.deA This user is from outside of this forum
                anlomedad@fedifreu.de
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @mdione @jeff

                Good thinking.
                I ran my own single-user mastodon instance for a year and I culled remote media from storage on a schedule. Can't say for sure now, but I think, the schedule was integrated in the mastodon ecosystem and not set up outside the system by myself.
                In any case, it was simple enough that even I could set up deletion of media of postings downloaded from other servers.

                Backup was actually the biggest storage requirement. Was glad to have had it tho, used its restore function several times.

                sraars@hippodon.comS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • bebef@mastodon.socialB bebef@mastodon.social

                  @jeff Moving to a different hoster is ... too simple? 🤔 Or why am I not reading "some may move to a more economically priced hoster"?

                  robotistry@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  robotistry@mstdn.caR This user is from outside of this forum
                  robotistry@mstdn.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @Bebef @jeff Because what's driving it is increased hardware costs that all hosters will have to accommodate, not something unique to specific hosters.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • anlomedad@fedifreu.deA anlomedad@fedifreu.de

                    @mdione @jeff

                    Good thinking.
                    I ran my own single-user mastodon instance for a year and I culled remote media from storage on a schedule. Can't say for sure now, but I think, the schedule was integrated in the mastodon ecosystem and not set up outside the system by myself.
                    In any case, it was simple enough that even I could set up deletion of media of postings downloaded from other servers.

                    Backup was actually the biggest storage requirement. Was glad to have had it tho, used its restore function several times.

                    sraars@hippodon.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sraars@hippodon.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sraars@hippodon.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @anlomedad @mdione @jeff Yes there are settings in the administration panel that you can set.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jeff@mainely.socialJ jeff@mainely.social

                      Hetzner, which many instances rely on, just announced a major across the board price hike. A 30% increase isn’t minor.

                      For larger companies it’s a budget line. For small Mastodon instances, it’s the line between sustainable and underwater.

                      When servers jump from €49.99 to €64.99 and storage rises too, admins feel it first. Many already subsidize costs.

                      Some will downsize. Some may shut down.

                      Decentralization still runs on invoices.

                      Support your instances.

                      #Mastoadmin #Hetzner

                      sraars@hippodon.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sraars@hippodon.comS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sraars@hippodon.com
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @jeff I run a single (mostly) user instance and my costs will be up about $3 a month because I run two (this instance and the Elasticsearch). I suppose I could consolidate or move, but I have these outside the US because of obvious reasons.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups