Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Mastodon
  4. Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026.

Today we're sharing the first in a series of three posts from our leadership team, starting with @mellifluousbox discussing our mission, and priorities for 2026.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mastodon
103 Posts 37 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • janantos@f.czJ janantos@f.cz

    @benroyce @iju @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron absolutely. However that time, even if you don’t use it, the credit limit goes negative to your credit score in bank risk assesment.

    iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iju@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #83

    @janantos @benroyce @ariarhythmic @mellifluousbox @Mastodon @MastodonEngineering @Gargron

    I believe that "credit score drops if you don't use the card" is an US speciality. At least I've never heard of it outside imported TV-shows.

    But it's a good point to say that not everyone owns a credit/debit card that works online. Though how many of those people are on Mastodon, is anyone's guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

      @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox You're trying to deal with defeat before it even happens. Governments DGAF about your Mastodon instance. But they're happy to have you complying in advance.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #84

      @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

      that's not what i said

      the point you're making is the point i made to you already:

      "of course if you're a small fish doing small fish things, you'll probably be fine for a long time"

      that's the real answer

      a 20 account mastodon instance will go 10 years before anyone cares about it and age verification. unless someone on your server gains attention of the fascists

      then the no age verification will be the conceit to dig on you

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

        that's not what i said

        the point you're making is the point i made to you already:

        "of course if you're a small fish doing small fish things, you'll probably be fine for a long time"

        that's the real answer

        a 20 account mastodon instance will go 10 years before anyone cares about it and age verification. unless someone on your server gains attention of the fascists

        then the no age verification will be the conceit to dig on you

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
        benroyce@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #85

        @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

        by the very same token, setting up goddamn shell corporations in foreign countries is not anything a mastodon server with 20 accounts is ever going to do. that was what i was pushing back against: going to absurd contortions to escape the age verification. no one is going to do that

        dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

          by the very same token, setting up goddamn shell corporations in foreign countries is not anything a mastodon server with 20 accounts is ever going to do. that was what i was pushing back against: going to absurd contortions to escape the age verification. no one is going to do that

          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          dalias@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #86

          @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox If you're a server with 20 accounts, it's probably not open registration anyway. In this case, the main "opsec" you should be doing is not publicly identifying who runs the server and what jurisdiction it's under.

          The case I was thinking of is more when you have a medium-sized, semi-open (e.g. by request/invite) instance with maybe 1000 or so users, which suddenly finds itself under threat of a being required to verify ages for its users. If you're not comfortable doing civil disobedience and just refusing to do that, the responsible thing is to restructure ownership outside of the jurisdiction. Whether that involves a "shell company" or real transfer of operations to trusted people elsewhere.

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

            @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox If you're a server with 20 accounts, it's probably not open registration anyway. In this case, the main "opsec" you should be doing is not publicly identifying who runs the server and what jurisdiction it's under.

            The case I was thinking of is more when you have a medium-sized, semi-open (e.g. by request/invite) instance with maybe 1000 or so users, which suddenly finds itself under threat of a being required to verify ages for its users. If you're not comfortable doing civil disobedience and just refusing to do that, the responsible thing is to restructure ownership outside of the jurisdiction. Whether that involves a "shell company" or real transfer of operations to trusted people elsewhere.

            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            benroyce@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #87

            @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

            you're not thinking about how this will play out in reality

            in reality they will not care if you don't have age verification if you have 5 users or 50,000

            but then someone on your server will draw the govt's attention. could be in 10 days. could be in 10 years. only then

            and in that moment, i don't care what obfuscation you have that you think will work. it will not work

            then absent age verification will be the conceit to go after you

            dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

              @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

              you're not thinking about how this will play out in reality

              in reality they will not care if you don't have age verification if you have 5 users or 50,000

              but then someone on your server will draw the govt's attention. could be in 10 days. could be in 10 years. only then

              and in that moment, i don't care what obfuscation you have that you think will work. it will not work

              then absent age verification will be the conceit to go after you

              dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              dalias@hachyderm.io
              wrote last edited by
              #88

              @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox The is absolutely what folks like me are talking about when we say "obeying in advance".

              There will ALWAYS be a conceit to go after you if you're a target.

              Kissing their asses 10 years in advance hoping it will not happen is a stupid strategy.

              You either do the civil disobedience openly, or you mitigate the risks as best you can.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox The is absolutely what folks like me are talking about when we say "obeying in advance".

                There will ALWAYS be a conceit to go after you if you're a target.

                Kissing their asses 10 years in advance hoping it will not happen is a stupid strategy.

                You either do the civil disobedience openly, or you mitigate the risks as best you can.

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #89

                @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                why do you frame this as me kissing fascist ass?

                i am talking about effective resistance

                you are talking about suicide

                the more accurate portrayal here is i am resisting intelligently

                while you go up to a fascist and tap them on the shoulder and ask to be shot in the face

                the issue here is being smart

                it's not good enough in this world to have only a strong heart

                you also need a strong mind

                dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                  why do you frame this as me kissing fascist ass?

                  i am talking about effective resistance

                  you are talking about suicide

                  the more accurate portrayal here is i am resisting intelligently

                  while you go up to a fascist and tap them on the shoulder and ask to be shot in the face

                  the issue here is being smart

                  it's not good enough in this world to have only a strong heart

                  you also need a strong mind

                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dalias@hachyderm.io
                  wrote last edited by
                  #90

                  @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox Making all your users dox themselves or share their biometrics with an face scanning provider quietly affiliated with Palantir is not going to help you at all if you're not targeted, and not going to save you if you are.

                  All it's going to do is fuel fascism.

                  If you're not clear on this you shouldn't be running a service of this sort, but leaving it to folks who can make responsible decisions.

                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                    @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox Making all your users dox themselves or share their biometrics with an face scanning provider quietly affiliated with Palantir is not going to help you at all if you're not targeted, and not going to save you if you are.

                    All it's going to do is fuel fascism.

                    If you're not clear on this you shouldn't be running a service of this sort, but leaving it to folks who can make responsible decisions.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #91

                    @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                    if you look elsewhere in this thread i'm advocating for using credit cards for verification like valve does with steam

                    so the server doesn't have to deal with ids. they just run a $0 check

                    additionally, it allows your cc to be attached to your profile, so donations are a breeze

                    not enough donate. and unless more people do, you and i butting heads here will just all evaporate some day

                    reality my friend

                    idealism is for lost fools

                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                      @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                      if you look elsewhere in this thread i'm advocating for using credit cards for verification like valve does with steam

                      so the server doesn't have to deal with ids. they just run a $0 check

                      additionally, it allows your cc to be attached to your profile, so donations are a breeze

                      not enough donate. and unless more people do, you and i butting heads here will just all evaporate some day

                      reality my friend

                      idealism is for lost fools

                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dalias@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #92

                      @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox What are you going to do with existing users who don't have credit cards? And can't get them? Or who have credit cards but whose safety might be put at risk by having their legal identity tied to their account and past writings?

                      Yes, for capitalist services that are going to obey age verification mandates, they absolutely should be offering "charge my credit card" as an option. I would even pay a one-time $20+ fee for this, anything to be able to continue using the service without submitting to face scanning or ID.

                      But non-capitalist things like Mastodon instances treating this as a harmless way to obey is NOT a good idea. It will exclude exactly the people we need to be including.

                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD benroyce@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                        @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox What are you going to do with existing users who don't have credit cards? And can't get them? Or who have credit cards but whose safety might be put at risk by having their legal identity tied to their account and past writings?

                        Yes, for capitalist services that are going to obey age verification mandates, they absolutely should be offering "charge my credit card" as an option. I would even pay a one-time $20+ fee for this, anything to be able to continue using the service without submitting to face scanning or ID.

                        But non-capitalist things like Mastodon instances treating this as a harmless way to obey is NOT a good idea. It will exclude exactly the people we need to be including.

                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dalias@hachyderm.io
                        wrote last edited by
                        #93

                        @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox One solution to the ills of verify-by-card, but also a reason I don't think the powers that be will let verify-by-card persist, is that I could just make a credit card with a $0 limit and share the number publicly for everyone to use until the card gets canceled, then repeat or have someone else do the same, until everyone who needs to get verified has done it.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                          @benroyce @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox What are you going to do with existing users who don't have credit cards? And can't get them? Or who have credit cards but whose safety might be put at risk by having their legal identity tied to their account and past writings?

                          Yes, for capitalist services that are going to obey age verification mandates, they absolutely should be offering "charge my credit card" as an option. I would even pay a one-time $20+ fee for this, anything to be able to continue using the service without submitting to face scanning or ID.

                          But non-capitalist things like Mastodon instances treating this as a harmless way to obey is NOT a good idea. It will exclude exactly the people we need to be including.

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #94

                          @dalias @vervain @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                          so you're advocating for donations, because you're not a fool, and you understand hosting services need to be paid

                          and at the same time, you're castigating me for asking for credit cards

                          work through the contradiction you just presented to me and get back to me

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                            @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                            the problem isn't mastodon it's your govt

                            if mastodon servers don't implement age verification in those jurisdictions that make it law, those servers get shut down by that govt

                            so you're blaming the wrong entity

                            are you really asking servers to face legal punishment and then get shut down anyway?

                            don't get me wrong: be angry

                            *at your govt*

                            not mastodon

                            suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                            suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                            suzannealdrich@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #95

                            @benroyce
                            I’d boil this down to, you can’t solve a social problem with technology. You can mitigate some of its effects but the underlying social parameters are still there. Nothing is going to save us from bad law except good votes.
                            @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS suzannealdrich@hachyderm.io

                              @benroyce
                              I’d boil this down to, you can’t solve a social problem with technology. You can mitigate some of its effects but the underlying social parameters are still there. Nothing is going to save us from bad law except good votes.
                              @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #96

                              @suzannealdrich @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                              THANK YOU

                              are you listening, toxic idealists?

                              suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                @suzannealdrich @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                THANK YOU

                                are you listening, toxic idealists?

                                suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                suzannealdrich@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #97

                                @benroyce
                                Also, and I’ll repeat this for those at the back:
                                Changing the system takes a lot of time and energy. There is no quick fix. The winner will always be the one that is more effective at networking and communication.
                                @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                macacator@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • suzannealdrich@hachyderm.ioS suzannealdrich@hachyderm.io

                                  @benroyce
                                  Also, and I’ll repeat this for those at the back:
                                  Changing the system takes a lot of time and energy. There is no quick fix. The winner will always be the one that is more effective at networking and communication.
                                  @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                  macacator@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  macacator@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  macacator@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #98

                                  @suzannealdrich @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox and willing to get their hands dirty

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • macacator@mastodon.socialM macacator@mastodon.social

                                    @suzannealdrich @benroyce @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox and willing to get their hands dirty

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #99

                                    @macacator @suzannealdrich @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                    anyone who thinks we can just sing kumbaya and solve all of our problems is a fool

                                    the dirty path always also needs to exist, even just in reference to put fear in the fascist's heart and force them to listen

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ariarhythmic@ohai.socialA ariarhythmic@ohai.social

                                      @benroyce @Mastodon @mellifluousbox Compliance with fascist laws is fascism.

                                      gerowen@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gerowen@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gerowen@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #100

                                      @ariarhythmic @benroyce @Mastodon @mellifluousbox Anybody that wants to operate their business in a country has to abide by the laws of that country. It's why Proton has been subpoened and had to hand over logs. It's the whole reason Signal collects as little data as possible, so they don't have anything to give but can still obey court orders. The alternative is for them to just leave that country entirely and abandon users who live there.

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gerowen@mastodon.socialG gerowen@mastodon.social

                                        @ariarhythmic @benroyce @Mastodon @mellifluousbox Anybody that wants to operate their business in a country has to abide by the laws of that country. It's why Proton has been subpoened and had to hand over logs. It's the whole reason Signal collects as little data as possible, so they don't have anything to give but can still obey court orders. The alternative is for them to just leave that country entirely and abandon users who live there.

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #101

                                        @gerowen @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                        toxic idealists don't listen

                                        they barge in, make impossible purity demands, then get angry and call us the enemy just because we live in reality

                                        effective resistance is having a big heart. *and* having a brain. know when to fight. know when to scram if it's a suicide mission or ineffective

                                        toxic idealists harm the left

                                        they poison our convos with impotent anger and brittle perfectionism, stifling effective resistance and not offering shit

                                        maya_b@hachyderm.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @gerowen @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                          toxic idealists don't listen

                                          they barge in, make impossible purity demands, then get angry and call us the enemy just because we live in reality

                                          effective resistance is having a big heart. *and* having a brain. know when to fight. know when to scram if it's a suicide mission or ineffective

                                          toxic idealists harm the left

                                          they poison our convos with impotent anger and brittle perfectionism, stifling effective resistance and not offering shit

                                          maya_b@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          maya_b@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          maya_b@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #102

                                          @benroyce

                                          somewhere along the line too many people forgot that you shouldn't let perfection get in the way of progress.

                                          @gerowen @ariarhythmic @Mastodon @mellifluousbox

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups