There's one very important thing I would like everyone to try to remember this week, and it is that AI companies are full of shit
-
@jenniferplusplus "Our new model is too dangerous for the public, we couldn't possibly release it! Anyway, you can subscribe to it for $150 a month."
@chrisp no, you cannot subscribe to it because it is NOT released yet.
-
@budududuroiu @jenniferplusplus I wouldn't give Anthropic's motives a lot of credit here but LLMs do make bug hunting much easier.
@mirth @budududuroiu @jenniferplusplus Tell that to all the open source repo maintainers who get spammed with fake, nonsensical bug reports generated by AI?
-
@mirth @budududuroiu @jenniferplusplus Tell that to all the open source repo maintainers who get spammed with fake, nonsensical bug reports generated by AI?
@jedimb They can... close submissions? Many projects already have. It's like a 2 second change.
-
@jedimb They can... close submissions? Many projects already have. It's like a 2 second change.
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus Making bug fixing more difficult because legitimate reports get blocked alongside the noise.
-
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus Making bug fixing more difficult because legitimate reports get blocked alongside the noise.
@jedimb and the alternative is?
-
There's one very important thing I would like everyone to try to remember this week, and it is that AI companies are full of shit
Only rarely do their claims actually bear scrutiny, and those are only the mildest of claims they make.
So, anthropic is claiming that their new, secret, unreleased model is hyper competent at finding computer security vulnerabilities and they're *too scared* to release it into the wild.
Except all the AI companies have been making the same hypercompetence claims about literally every avenue of knowledge work for 3+ years, and it's literally never true. So please keep in mind the highly likely possibility that this is mostly or entirely bullshit marketing meant to distract you from the absolute garbage fire that is the code base of the poster child application for "agentically" developed software
You may now resume doom scrolling. Thank you
@jenniferplusplus Big AI is making all AI look bad.
-
@jedimb and the alternative is?
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus What we had just a few years ago.
-
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus What we had just a few years ago.
@jedimb yeah well that ship has sailed long ago.
-
@jedimb yeah well that ship has sailed long ago.
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus "The plague is here. Let's just live with it" does seem to be a recurring sentiment, but it doesn't change that it's a plague.
-
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus "The plague is here. Let's just live with it" does seem to be a recurring sentiment, but it doesn't change that it's a plague.
@jedimb norms are downstream from power. Current power balance is shifted towards frontier labs and hyperscalers, norms around personal computing (RAM prices) and open source software (AI slop floods) are dictated by them.
Moralising AI use with no power to back it up is useless, gatekeeping is power because it says "want to contribute to this project, abide by our rules"
The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out
Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.
Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)
-
@dngrs Well, you're partly correct, partly wrong. Yes, pretrained transformers are, like all generative models, definitionally modelling a joint probability distribution, and autoregressively generating from that joint probability distribution.
Those are the models you're referring to as autocomplete tools, hence why you had to use `[MASK]` with early transformers like BERT to get them to complete the "most probable token".
Regardless, it doesn't matter what Anthropic did, if it allows for a massive reduction in cost of finding zero days, it's a problem. It doesn't have to be revolutionary, it doesn't have to be superintelligence, AGI, whatever woo-hoo flashy marketing terms. If a reduction in cost of computing protein folding happens, i.e. OpenFold implementation of AlphaFold, that wouldn't be revolutionary, but would still be dangerous, since you now potentially have lone actors being able to make prions at home (I'm using this as an absurd, but probable case).
@budududuroiu @jenniferplusplus it's funny you bring up AlphaFold because that also has been way overhyped, according to people working in the field (I don't have links to individual statements anymore sadly, been a few years but the Wikipedia page also mentions e.g. AF not really understanding folding). Anyway: as long as there is no concrete data regarding severe CVE increase with a causal link to newer LLMs (which again are still LLMs that do not understand facts) I'll keep holding my breath.
-
@jedimb norms are downstream from power. Current power balance is shifted towards frontier labs and hyperscalers, norms around personal computing (RAM prices) and open source software (AI slop floods) are dictated by them.
Moralising AI use with no power to back it up is useless, gatekeeping is power because it says "want to contribute to this project, abide by our rules"
The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out
Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.
Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)
@budududuroiu @mirth @jenniferplusplus Goal post moved into a different dimension, I see.
-
@budududuroiu @jenniferplusplus it's funny you bring up AlphaFold because that also has been way overhyped, according to people working in the field (I don't have links to individual statements anymore sadly, been a few years but the Wikipedia page also mentions e.g. AF not really understanding folding). Anyway: as long as there is no concrete data regarding severe CVE increase with a causal link to newer LLMs (which again are still LLMs that do not understand facts) I'll keep holding my breath.
@dngrs @jenniferplusplus I'm sorry, I know thinking conceptually isn't easy for everyone, I tried using AlphaFold because some people have an easier time when presented with examples.
Why would there be an increase in CVEs? If I was an actor with nation-state levels of access to compute, why would I waste all that compute on zero days, only to then publish CVEs about them?
Even the most AI skeptic maintainers start to admit that LLMs are getting good at finding bugs. I understand cynicism is seen as cool nowadays but I think it's intellectually lazy
daniel:// stenberg:// (@bagder@mastodon.social)
I ran a quick git log grep just now. Over the last ~6 months or so, we have fixed over 200 bugs in #curl found with "AI tools".
Mastodon (mastodon.social)
-
@dngrs @jenniferplusplus I'm sorry, I know thinking conceptually isn't easy for everyone, I tried using AlphaFold because some people have an easier time when presented with examples.
Why would there be an increase in CVEs? If I was an actor with nation-state levels of access to compute, why would I waste all that compute on zero days, only to then publish CVEs about them?
Even the most AI skeptic maintainers start to admit that LLMs are getting good at finding bugs. I understand cynicism is seen as cool nowadays but I think it's intellectually lazy
daniel:// stenberg:// (@bagder@mastodon.social)
I ran a quick git log grep just now. Over the last ~6 months or so, we have fixed over 200 bugs in #curl found with "AI tools".
Mastodon (mastodon.social)
@budududuroiu holy condescension Batman lol, no thank you
-
There's one very important thing I would like everyone to try to remember this week, and it is that AI companies are full of shit
Only rarely do their claims actually bear scrutiny, and those are only the mildest of claims they make.
So, anthropic is claiming that their new, secret, unreleased model is hyper competent at finding computer security vulnerabilities and they're *too scared* to release it into the wild.
Except all the AI companies have been making the same hypercompetence claims about literally every avenue of knowledge work for 3+ years, and it's literally never true. So please keep in mind the highly likely possibility that this is mostly or entirely bullshit marketing meant to distract you from the absolute garbage fire that is the code base of the poster child application for "agentically" developed software
You may now resume doom scrolling. Thank you
@jenniferplusplus 37th time's the charm! This time *for real*.
-
There's one very important thing I would like everyone to try to remember this week, and it is that AI companies are full of shit
Only rarely do their claims actually bear scrutiny, and those are only the mildest of claims they make.
So, anthropic is claiming that their new, secret, unreleased model is hyper competent at finding computer security vulnerabilities and they're *too scared* to release it into the wild.
Except all the AI companies have been making the same hypercompetence claims about literally every avenue of knowledge work for 3+ years, and it's literally never true. So please keep in mind the highly likely possibility that this is mostly or entirely bullshit marketing meant to distract you from the absolute garbage fire that is the code base of the poster child application for "agentically" developed software
You may now resume doom scrolling. Thank you
@jenniferplusplus The issue is that big enough corpos don't care about code quality anymore, and they don't care about vulnerabilities being there for months (years sometimes) or leaks. Nobody care about these anymore.. they want results fast to sell quick and move on.
-
@jenniferplusplus Open AI made similar claims about their model being so good it was dangerous and they weren't going to release it. In 2019. https://techcrunch.com/2019/02/17/openai-text-generator-dangerous/
@fancysandwiches oh wow, a headline that describes these things as text generators.
How far we've fallen
-
@dngrs @jenniferplusplus I'm sorry, I know thinking conceptually isn't easy for everyone, I tried using AlphaFold because some people have an easier time when presented with examples.
Why would there be an increase in CVEs? If I was an actor with nation-state levels of access to compute, why would I waste all that compute on zero days, only to then publish CVEs about them?
Even the most AI skeptic maintainers start to admit that LLMs are getting good at finding bugs. I understand cynicism is seen as cool nowadays but I think it's intellectually lazy
daniel:// stenberg:// (@bagder@mastodon.social)
I ran a quick git log grep just now. Over the last ~6 months or so, we have fixed over 200 bugs in #curl found with "AI tools".
Mastodon (mastodon.social)
@budududuroiu @dngrs you may as well stop, you're not going to convince me to trust them. Only anthropic can do that, because they have truly earned my distrust.
-
There's one very important thing I would like everyone to try to remember this week, and it is that AI companies are full of shit
Only rarely do their claims actually bear scrutiny, and those are only the mildest of claims they make.
So, anthropic is claiming that their new, secret, unreleased model is hyper competent at finding computer security vulnerabilities and they're *too scared* to release it into the wild.
Except all the AI companies have been making the same hypercompetence claims about literally every avenue of knowledge work for 3+ years, and it's literally never true. So please keep in mind the highly likely possibility that this is mostly or entirely bullshit marketing meant to distract you from the absolute garbage fire that is the code base of the poster child application for "agentically" developed software
You may now resume doom scrolling. Thank you
@jenniferplusplus Agree that it is mostly for marketing & investors.
But the article was technical enough, that I think there is an improvement here that no other model has. And if true, it would be great for vulnerability scanning/hardening in general (bad that attackers would have access to it though).
-
There's one very important thing I would like everyone to try to remember this week, and it is that AI companies are full of shit
Only rarely do their claims actually bear scrutiny, and those are only the mildest of claims they make.
So, anthropic is claiming that their new, secret, unreleased model is hyper competent at finding computer security vulnerabilities and they're *too scared* to release it into the wild.
Except all the AI companies have been making the same hypercompetence claims about literally every avenue of knowledge work for 3+ years, and it's literally never true. So please keep in mind the highly likely possibility that this is mostly or entirely bullshit marketing meant to distract you from the absolute garbage fire that is the code base of the poster child application for "agentically" developed software
You may now resume doom scrolling. Thank you
@jenniferplusplus Worth a follow for that post alone. Hi, I'm Bill.
