Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. “So it failed age verification and locked me out of many features.

“So it failed age verification and locked me out of many features.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • soapdog@toot.cafeS soapdog@toot.cafe

    @aral am fumming here

    aral@mastodon.ar.alA This user is from outside of this forum
    aral@mastodon.ar.alA This user is from outside of this forum
    aral@mastodon.ar.al
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @soapdog PS. Have you heard of this phone? (Sadly they’re US-based)

    FuriPhone FLX1s Linux Phone

    favicon

    FuriPhone FLX1s Linux Phone (furilabs.com)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aral@mastodon.ar.alA aral@mastodon.ar.al

      RE: https://toot.cafe/@soapdog/116290204253136215

      “So it failed age verification and locked me out of many features. Bear in mind, I am 45 years old. I have an Apple account for 25 years, the age of my personal account alone should already verify my age.

      Credit cards are not documents. Many people don’t have them. Apple don’t provide any other way to verify your age because they are a stupid American company with American values in which you’re just as human as your credit score.

      Age verification is a scam, but checking it with a credit card is even worse.”

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      buubuu@techhub.social
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @aral
      If you're looking for a de-Googled #Android phone, I highly recommend GrapheneOS. I switched from using Google Android a few months ago as my daily driver and couldn't be happier.
      I don't know about specifically banking applications, but I have to have several apps for work that rely on Google Services, and have had no issues with any of them.
      On the note of switching to #linux beware that many distributions are implementing age verification as well through the reliance on systemd.
      I have switched to Void Linux from Debian and Fedora, and am so far quite pleased with it. It is certainly a learning process, but I'm very satisfied with the OS.
      @GrapheneOS
      @VoidLinux

      jstark@tweesecake.socialJ jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • B buubuu@techhub.social

        @aral
        If you're looking for a de-Googled #Android phone, I highly recommend GrapheneOS. I switched from using Google Android a few months ago as my daily driver and couldn't be happier.
        I don't know about specifically banking applications, but I have to have several apps for work that rely on Google Services, and have had no issues with any of them.
        On the note of switching to #linux beware that many distributions are implementing age verification as well through the reliance on systemd.
        I have switched to Void Linux from Debian and Fedora, and am so far quite pleased with it. It is certainly a learning process, but I'm very satisfied with the OS.
        @GrapheneOS
        @VoidLinux

        jstark@tweesecake.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jstark@tweesecake.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jstark@tweesecake.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux what device did you do this on?

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B buubuu@techhub.social

          @aral
          If you're looking for a de-Googled #Android phone, I highly recommend GrapheneOS. I switched from using Google Android a few months ago as my daily driver and couldn't be happier.
          I don't know about specifically banking applications, but I have to have several apps for work that rely on Google Services, and have had no issues with any of them.
          On the note of switching to #linux beware that many distributions are implementing age verification as well through the reliance on systemd.
          I have switched to Void Linux from Debian and Fedora, and am so far quite pleased with it. It is certainly a learning process, but I'm very satisfied with the OS.
          @GrapheneOS
          @VoidLinux

          jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jmaris@eupolicy.social
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux your understanding of what systemd is doing is totally flawed.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ jmaris@eupolicy.social

            @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux your understanding of what systemd is doing is totally flawed.

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            buubuu@techhub.social
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @jmaris @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux
            Can you elaborate on how? I'm by no means an expert and would appreciate any information you can share.
            From my understanding, systemd is implementing the system for applications to request age ranges. While I understand this is not as intrusive as age verification in other systems being implemented, it seems to be laying the groundwork for it.
            I have also come across other issues people have with systemd, would you mind sharing your stance on this? I have thus far been pleased in learning to use runit on Void Linux.

            jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jstark@tweesecake.socialJ jstark@tweesecake.social

              @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux what device did you do this on?

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              buubuu@techhub.social
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @jstark @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux
              I have been running GrapheneOS on a Pixel 9a.
              I setup Void Linux on my ThinkPad T440p first (I use this as more of a computer just for tinkering), and then on my E14 gen 6, which is my daily driver.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B buubuu@techhub.social

                @jmaris @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux
                Can you elaborate on how? I'm by no means an expert and would appreciate any information you can share.
                From my understanding, systemd is implementing the system for applications to request age ranges. While I understand this is not as intrusive as age verification in other systems being implemented, it seems to be laying the groundwork for it.
                I have also come across other issues people have with systemd, would you mind sharing your stance on this? I have thus far been pleased in learning to use runit on Void Linux.

                jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jmaris@eupolicy.social
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux the patch literally adds a date of birth field to user data, that is all. It's not an API for age verification. In addition the information is set by the user.

                B h3mmy@tech.lgbtH 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ jmaris@eupolicy.social

                  @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux the patch literally adds a date of birth field to user data, that is all. It's not an API for age verification. In addition the information is set by the user.

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  buubuu@techhub.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @jmaris @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux
                  That's good to know, thank you for sharing. Do you feel that there is cause for concern regarding this along with recent legislation mandating age verification?
                  Again, not an expert, I'm still trying to learn to navigate this field in my attempts to regain control of my devices.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jmaris@eupolicy.socialJ jmaris@eupolicy.social

                    @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux the patch literally adds a date of birth field to user data, that is all. It's not an API for age verification. In addition the information is set by the user.

                    h3mmy@tech.lgbtH This user is from outside of this forum
                    h3mmy@tech.lgbtH This user is from outside of this forum
                    h3mmy@tech.lgbt
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @jmaris @BuuBuu @aral @GrapheneOS @VoidLinux There is no legitimate reason an OS needs to have a DOB field for user data.

                    It's a fundamental concept for Data Minimization

                    "Don't store any more information than you actually need"

                    If an application or other user-space extension has a need for a dob, it should be implemented there, not as part of the init daemon.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • aral@mastodon.ar.alA aral@mastodon.ar.al

                      RE: https://toot.cafe/@soapdog/116290204253136215

                      “So it failed age verification and locked me out of many features. Bear in mind, I am 45 years old. I have an Apple account for 25 years, the age of my personal account alone should already verify my age.

                      Credit cards are not documents. Many people don’t have them. Apple don’t provide any other way to verify your age because they are a stupid American company with American values in which you’re just as human as your credit score.

                      Age verification is a scam, but checking it with a credit card is even worse.”

                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @aral The laws being proposed and passed requiring providing age brackets to apps and websites are a horrific invasion of privacy for minors putting their safety at risk. It not only enables targeting minors in harmful ways particularly for the lowest age brackets but also leaks their birth date to apps and websites on the day they move into the next age bracket. One of the biggest lobbyists for these OS level age verification laws is Meta which just lost a court case for exploiting minors.

                      grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                        @aral The laws being proposed and passed requiring providing age brackets to apps and websites are a horrific invasion of privacy for minors putting their safety at risk. It not only enables targeting minors in harmful ways particularly for the lowest age brackets but also leaks their birth date to apps and websites on the day they move into the next age bracket. One of the biggest lobbyists for these OS level age verification laws is Meta which just lost a court case for exploiting minors.

                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grapheneos@grapheneos.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @aral These laws dictating the information can only be used for gating access based on age is beyond ridiculous. There's no doubt they're aware it's going to be heavily used beyond the permitted use. It cannot be excused as naivety. These same governments often treat birth dates as highly sensitive information usable as a core part of authenticating people's identity. Meanwhile, they're passing laws forcing operating systems and browsers to leak the birth dates of minors to apps and websites.

                        emerson61@toot.communityE 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • grapheneos@grapheneos.socialG grapheneos@grapheneos.social

                          @aral These laws dictating the information can only be used for gating access based on age is beyond ridiculous. There's no doubt they're aware it's going to be heavily used beyond the permitted use. It cannot be excused as naivety. These same governments often treat birth dates as highly sensitive information usable as a core part of authenticating people's identity. Meanwhile, they're passing laws forcing operating systems and browsers to leak the birth dates of minors to apps and websites.

                          emerson61@toot.communityE This user is from outside of this forum
                          emerson61@toot.communityE This user is from outside of this forum
                          emerson61@toot.community
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @GrapheneOS @aral Meta is the primary driver of this among private sector companies. Their entire business model is showing ads to people, knowing exactly who they are. This is 1000% a blatant attempt to pierce pseudonymity online.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups