Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I give you the comments of John Fetterman, the only Democratic Senator who voted not to limit Trump’s war of whim in Iran.

I give you the comments of John Fetterman, the only Democratic Senator who voted not to limit Trump’s war of whim in Iran.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
27 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • finchhaven@sfba.socialF finchhaven@sfba.social

    @meuwese

    "I understand at the top of the thread you speak of a "view", but this statement is not a view, it's just nonsense. So either this is just the garbled nonsense they believe, or they don't want to achieve any kind of settlement under any circumstances..."

    It seems you may be unfamiliar with #JohnFetterman

    #Fetterman suffered a stroke during the 2022 campaign that got him elected, and has permanent implanted device assistance since

    Fetterman has always been a bit of a loose cannon; since his stroke he has been consistently erratic in his political statements, to the point where one could reasonably feel he simply doesn't know *where* he stands

    All that said, Fetterman has consistently moved right, and as a political weather vane spins to the right far more than any other direction

    Some claim he's trying to be edgy and contrarian; others (myself) see him as merely addled and confused

    IMO, YMMV...

    cc @heidilifeldman

    meuwese@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    meuwese@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    meuwese@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    @FinchHaven @heidilifeldman but so not genocidal? Because this means genocide, logically speaking.

    finchhaven@sfba.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • meuwese@mastodon.socialM meuwese@mastodon.social

      @FinchHaven @heidilifeldman but so not genocidal? Because this means genocide, logically speaking.

      finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      finchhaven@sfba.social
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      @meuwese

      ""If you're on #Twitter and you quote #Grok about a stupid response its made...""

      Reply proceeds to wildly leap to "genocide"

      Sorry, I will not be joining you on your...

      ...digression, is it?

      cc @heidilifeldman

      meuwese@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • finchhaven@sfba.socialF finchhaven@sfba.social

        @meuwese

        ""If you're on #Twitter and you quote #Grok about a stupid response its made...""

        Reply proceeds to wildly leap to "genocide"

        Sorry, I will not be joining you on your...

        ...digression, is it?

        cc @heidilifeldman

        meuwese@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        meuwese@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        meuwese@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        @FinchHaven @heidilifeldman did you read what Fetterman said? He's up for killing every appointed leader, one after the other. So that means everyone.

        finchhaven@sfba.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • meuwese@mastodon.socialM meuwese@mastodon.social

          @FinchHaven @heidilifeldman did you read what Fetterman said? He's up for killing every appointed leader, one after the other. So that means everyone.

          finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          finchhaven@sfba.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
          finchhaven@sfba.social
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          @meuwese

          Did you read what I said?

          Fetterman is random approaching incoherent

          On his best days

          meuwese@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • finchhaven@sfba.socialF finchhaven@sfba.social

            @meuwese

            Did you read what I said?

            Fetterman is random approaching incoherent

            On his best days

            meuwese@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            meuwese@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            meuwese@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            @FinchHaven I did, but I indeed can't quite grasp it. Like, how can that even be the case. How is nobody able to do anything about that.

            barbramon1@mas.toB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
            • heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH heidilifeldman@mastodon.social

              Donald Trump has destabilized the region from Greenland to Venezuela and Ecuador. By Fetterman’s reasoning, any country in the region, along with its allies in other regions, may justifiedly assassinate Trump, including by use of military force. 6/6

              heathertx@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              heathertx@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
              heathertx@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              @heidilifeldman Let me get my popcorn. 🍿

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH heidilifeldman@mastodon.social

                Apart from whether Fetterman is urging possible violation of the UN Charter, to which the U.S. is a signatory, Fetterman’s views about the acceptability of a country taking military action to assassinate another country’s leader for destabilizing a region seems particularly odd for Senator whose own country’s President has destabilized that country’s region. 5/

                heathertx@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                heathertx@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                heathertx@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                @heidilifeldman And if we (and Israel) keep killing people in Iran until someone in the administration is satisfied with the body count, we’re committing more genocide. #warcrimes

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH heidilifeldman@mastodon.social

                  ‘When Bolduan pushed further on the issue, asking Fetterman who should decide the leader of Iran "if you think the United State should take part in taking out every next leader going forward" if the leader doesn't meet the right measure, he responded by saing he "absolutely" supports killing the leadership of Iran.’ 3/

                  heathertx@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  heathertx@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  heathertx@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  @heidilifeldman Fetterman has not been well for quite some time, apparently.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • meuwese@mastodon.socialM meuwese@mastodon.social

                    @FinchHaven I did, but I indeed can't quite grasp it. Like, how can that even be the case. How is nobody able to do anything about that.

                    barbramon1@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
                    barbramon1@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
                    barbramon1@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    @meuwese @FinchHaven The only sure way to rid ourselves of a mentally deficient politician is to vote him out of office. He could be expelled by the Senate but it's been 150 years since that has happened. It requires a two thirds vote, an impossibility in the current Senate.
                    I once supported him, but he has changed radically. Best case scenario is that he would voluntarily retire before his term ends in 2029.
                    Chances are slim to none.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cdncurmudgeon@mastodon.socialC cdncurmudgeon@mastodon.social

                      @heidilifeldman Fetterman is the best Repugnican of all the Democrats.

                      fskornia@glammr.usF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fskornia@glammr.usF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fskornia@glammr.us
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      @CdnCurmudgeon @heidilifeldman Someone had to step in the role emptied by Manchin and Sinema when they quit. Fetterman just enthusiastically dove in headfirst.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH heidilifeldman@mastodon.social

                        Donald Trump has destabilized the region from Greenland to Venezuela and Ecuador. By Fetterman’s reasoning, any country in the region, along with its allies in other regions, may justifiedly assassinate Trump, including by use of military force. 6/6

                        mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mike@thecanadian.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        @heidilifeldman Well the problem is that what if Donald Trump wakes up one day and decides that the leader of your country needs to die because they increased a tariff on US automobiles or maybe a governor of a blue state needs to die, or perhaps the CEO of Netflix. You get my drift.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups