Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, this doesn't help things at all.

Well, this doesn't help things at all.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
12 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL lapt0r@infosec.exchange

    @AAKL @TheConversationUS the MRFF got like a hundred complaints across thirty installations of commanding officers doing shit like gleefully talking about the Iran war specifically being about kicking off Armageddon.

    The US military has a huge doomsday fundamentalist problem in leadership and has for decades.

    aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
    aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
    aakl@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @lapt0r @TheConversationUS Does this narrative sell?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL lapt0r@infosec.exchange

      @AAKL @TheConversationUS the MRFF got like a hundred complaints across thirty installations of commanding officers doing shit like gleefully talking about the Iran war specifically being about kicking off Armageddon.

      The US military has a huge doomsday fundamentalist problem in leadership and has for decades.

      jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jik@federate.social
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @lapt0r @AAKL @TheConversationUS Except the MRFF hasn't actually been able to provide concrete evidence that any of those supposed complaints are real, and no one has gone to complain to any other media outlet or their senator or congressman, and no other media outlet has been able to corroborate MRFF's story.
      Not saying there isn't a problem in the military. Just saying MRFF isn't the most trustworthy spokesman about the substance or magnitude of the problem.

      lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jik@federate.socialJ jik@federate.social

        @lapt0r @AAKL @TheConversationUS Except the MRFF hasn't actually been able to provide concrete evidence that any of those supposed complaints are real, and no one has gone to complain to any other media outlet or their senator or congressman, and no other media outlet has been able to corroborate MRFF's story.
        Not saying there isn't a problem in the military. Just saying MRFF isn't the most trustworthy spokesman about the substance or magnitude of the problem.

        lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
        lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
        lapt0r@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @jik @AAKL @TheConversationUS went to school with those people. Weinstein was a Reagan admin guy. It's so painfully on brand for them I have zero reason to doubt the veracity of these claims.

        jik@federate.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL lapt0r@infosec.exchange

          @jik @AAKL @TheConversationUS went to school with those people. Weinstein was a Reagan admin guy. It's so painfully on brand for them I have zero reason to doubt the veracity of these claims.

          jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jik@federate.social
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @lapt0r @AAKL @TheConversationUS smdh facts and accuracy and verifiability actually matter.
          Do you think it helps or hurts the cause of keeping religion out of the military when the organization purportedly at the vanguard of fighting for it gets caught making shit up?

          aakl@infosec.exchangeA lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • jik@federate.socialJ jik@federate.social

            @lapt0r @AAKL @TheConversationUS smdh facts and accuracy and verifiability actually matter.
            Do you think it helps or hurts the cause of keeping religion out of the military when the organization purportedly at the vanguard of fighting for it gets caught making shit up?

            aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
            aakl@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
            aakl@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @jik @lapt0r @TheConversationUS It looks like more than 200 complaints were made to MRFF. I see no other organization mentioned. But there are some wild claims out there https://www.financialexpress.com/world-news/us-news/trump-anointed-by-jesus-iran-war-was-gods-divine-plan-what-us-military-commanders-told-troops/4162672/

            Snopes fact check: https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/03/03/us-troops-iran-armageddon-jesus/

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jik@federate.socialJ jik@federate.social

              @lapt0r @AAKL @TheConversationUS smdh facts and accuracy and verifiability actually matter.
              Do you think it helps or hurts the cause of keeping religion out of the military when the organization purportedly at the vanguard of fighting for it gets caught making shit up?

              lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
              lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
              lapt0r@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @jik @AAKL @TheConversationUS if you have red state reps, good luck complaining to the civilian government, they will narc on you immediately.

              Same for anything from Murdochosphere, Sinclair group, probably Bezos at this point, anything Thiel has touched...

              Active duty servicemembers also have restrictions around communicating with foreign nationals - this is part of the stuff they drill into your head during basic.

              So if you're an enlisted 19 year old from an unfriendly (or unknown alignment) legislative district, who do you call?

              I hope these claims are independently verified. I don't think foreign services will have a lot of success doing so, and I don't really expect the big US media players to play ball - they need access which will be pulled immediately if any sort of investigative journalism comes to the attention of the admin.

              jik@federate.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL lapt0r@infosec.exchange

                @jik @AAKL @TheConversationUS if you have red state reps, good luck complaining to the civilian government, they will narc on you immediately.

                Same for anything from Murdochosphere, Sinclair group, probably Bezos at this point, anything Thiel has touched...

                Active duty servicemembers also have restrictions around communicating with foreign nationals - this is part of the stuff they drill into your head during basic.

                So if you're an enlisted 19 year old from an unfriendly (or unknown alignment) legislative district, who do you call?

                I hope these claims are independently verified. I don't think foreign services will have a lot of success doing so, and I don't really expect the big US media players to play ball - they need access which will be pulled immediately if any sort of investigative journalism comes to the attention of the admin.

                jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jik@federate.social
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @lapt0r
                The extent to which you are either missing or intentionally obfuscating the point is quite impressive.
                I could quibble with some of the details of your long explanation above, but it's beside the point.
                It strains credulity to the point of absurdity to suggest that (a) all those young, naive soldiers knew to contact the MRFF with their complaints and (b) *not a single soldier* chose to complain *to anyone else* with incentive to publicize their complaint.
                (1/2)
                @AAKL

                jik@federate.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jik@federate.socialJ jik@federate.social

                  @lapt0r
                  The extent to which you are either missing or intentionally obfuscating the point is quite impressive.
                  I could quibble with some of the details of your long explanation above, but it's beside the point.
                  It strains credulity to the point of absurdity to suggest that (a) all those young, naive soldiers knew to contact the MRFF with their complaints and (b) *not a single soldier* chose to complain *to anyone else* with incentive to publicize their complaint.
                  (1/2)
                  @AAKL

                  jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jik@federate.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @lapt0r
                  You know that infosec saying, "Attackers only need to succeed once. Defenders need to succeed every time."
                  Well, for the MRFF's story to be corroborated, we only need *one* out of a supposed *hundreds* of complaints to talk to someone else.
                  The fact that hasn't happened is incredibly strong circumstantial evidence that MRFF's claims are made up.
                  (2/2)
                  @AAKL

                  lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • jik@federate.socialJ jik@federate.social

                    @lapt0r
                    You know that infosec saying, "Attackers only need to succeed once. Defenders need to succeed every time."
                    Well, for the MRFF's story to be corroborated, we only need *one* out of a supposed *hundreds* of complaints to talk to someone else.
                    The fact that hasn't happened is incredibly strong circumstantial evidence that MRFF's claims are made up.
                    (2/2)
                    @AAKL

                    lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lapt0r@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @jik @AAKL I don't think they have a friendly second source to complain to with resources to verify. Clearly you do. I think this puts us at an impasse.

                    I hope your assumption is incorrect and the MRFF is just really bad at messaging. Time will tell.

                    jik@federate.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                    • lapt0r@infosec.exchangeL lapt0r@infosec.exchange

                      @jik @AAKL I don't think they have a friendly second source to complain to with resources to verify. Clearly you do. I think this puts us at an impasse.

                      I hope your assumption is incorrect and the MRFF is just really bad at messaging. Time will tell.

                      jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jik@federate.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jik@federate.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @lapt0r The statement "Out of over 200 service members who felt the need to complain, not a single one of them was willing to do so non-anonymously on the record and able to figure out how to do that" is not as supportive of our men in uniform as you seem to think it is. @AAKL

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups