Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
94 Posts 69 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jorismeys@mstdn.socialJ jorismeys@mstdn.social

    RE: https://equestria.social/@cloudhop/116077882659405785

    @cloudhop Equally funny (or depressing) to watch CEOs not seeing how "20-30% Microsoft code now written by AI" at the same time we see "security leak in Notepad" and "Windows 11 performance drop after last update" is not a recommendation for AI...

    So can we tap the sign "when a measure becomes the goal, it stops being a measure" a few more times? One day they'll get it. One day...

    tessarakt@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tessarakt@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tessarakt@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #50

    @JorisMeys @cloudhop and the next day they'll forget.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

      It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

      tk@f.kawa-kun.comT This user is from outside of this forum
      tk@f.kawa-kun.comT This user is from outside of this forum
      tk@f.kawa-kun.com
      wrote last edited by
      #51
      @cloudhop
      Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

        It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

        hi_cial@donphan.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        hi_cial@donphan.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        hi_cial@donphan.social
        wrote last edited by
        #52

        @cloudhop imagine being like 'now buildings are no longer constrained by the speed at which we mill wood'

        like ok uh that
        really isnt the major factor in what takes up the time of this lengthy engineering and construction process tho

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

          It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

          phreakmonkey@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          phreakmonkey@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
          phreakmonkey@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #53

          @cloudhop yeah and imagine the medical breakthroughs we'll get when surgeons are no longer constrained by scalpel speed!!

          ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

            It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

            ali@leftist.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
            ali@leftist.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
            ali@leftist.network
            wrote last edited by
            #54

            @cloudhop

            The rich has zero idea about the labour AND the product. For them, everything is just commodity. Maybe because they have zero taste.

            Which might explain why most of the luxury goods are so ugly.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

              It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

              bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
              bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
              bri7@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #55

              @cloudhop if programming is mostly typing, can we maybe consider designing better programming languages?

              cloudhop@equestria.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB bri7@social.treehouse.systems

                @cloudhop if programming is mostly typing, can we maybe consider designing better programming languages?

                cloudhop@equestria.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cloudhop@equestria.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                cloudhop@equestria.social
                wrote last edited by
                #56

                @bri7 Ironically i've been trying to help my friend design a new programming language but nobody seems to think that better type systems are worth bothering with, they just look at the syntax.

                bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

                  @bri7 Ironically i've been trying to help my friend design a new programming language but nobody seems to think that better type systems are worth bothering with, they just look at the syntax.

                  bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bri7@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #57

                  @cloudhop in
                  my humble opinion: better type systems, yes;

                  more type annotations and type syntax: no

                  bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB cloudhop@equestria.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB bri7@social.treehouse.systems

                    @cloudhop in
                    my humble opinion: better type systems, yes;

                    more type annotations and type syntax: no

                    bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bri7@social.treehouse.systems
                    wrote last edited by
                    #58

                    @cloudhop more types does not lead to better types

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB bri7@social.treehouse.systems

                      @cloudhop in
                      my humble opinion: better type systems, yes;

                      more type annotations and type syntax: no

                      cloudhop@equestria.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cloudhop@equestria.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cloudhop@equestria.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #59

                      @bri7 See, it's hard to explain to people that you need a much more complex and powerful type system in order to *reduce* type annotations precisely because of unsolved problems surrounding inference algorithms (which is precisely what broke our first attempt). For some reason most people seem to think "better types" means "more type annotations" and I'm not sure how to explain the difference.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cloudhop@equestria.socialC cloudhop@equestria.social

                        It's either very funny or very depressing to watch executives trip over themselves to prove who has the worst understanding of what software development actually entails.

                        elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                        elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                        elexia@catcatnya.com
                        wrote last edited by
                        #60

                        @cloudhop what does he... how...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jacel@m.prettyshiny.orgJ jacel@m.prettyshiny.org

                          @cloudhop @xgranade Any time I see 'serial entrepreneur' the first thought is 'okay so what happened to all their other ventures'.

                          elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                          elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
                          elexia@catcatnya.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #61

                          @jacel @cloudhop @xgranade if you have money you can afford to fail so many times

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • geospacedman@mastodon.socialG geospacedman@mastodon.social

                            @cloudhop Yeah, I remember all my software engineering skills I got from Mavis Beacon.

                            timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                            timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                            timwardcam@c.im
                            wrote last edited by
                            #62

                            @geospacedman @cloudhop I have often wished that I could restrict my hiring of software engineers to people who could actually touch type (they're more likely to write things like comments and documentation) but sadly that would have limited the available pool. We're talking about the days when typing lessons in schools were only offered to girls, and most software engineers were boys.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • julesbl@mastodon.me.ukJ julesbl@mastodon.me.uk

                              @cloudhop
                              I remember managers at a firm I worked for suggesting that the typists should enter the code to speed things up ๐Ÿ˜

                              timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                              timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                              timwardcam@c.im
                              wrote last edited by
                              #63

                              @julesbl @cloudhop That was done for a while. Programmers wrote by hand onto coding forms which "punch girls" typed onto punched cards.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • julesbl@mastodon.me.ukJ julesbl@mastodon.me.uk

                                @cloudhop
                                I remember managers at a firm I worked for suggesting that the typists should enter the code to speed things up ๐Ÿ˜

                                brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                brouhaha@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #64

                                @julesbl @cloudhop
                                That was actually common practice in the 1960s and early-mid 1970s. The people who did the typing were called "keypunch operators". Programmers would hand-print their programs on coding forms.
                                It may have been the case that most programmers did not have typing skills, but that was not the primary force driving that method of computer usage, and it certainly did not make programming faster.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • lacey@mastodon.gamedev.placeL lacey@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                  @cloudhop The number of times in 30+ years my development speed has been constrained by the speed of my fingers: 0.

                                  timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  timwardcam@c.im
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #65

                                  @Lacey @cloudhop Not me. I was taught to touch type by a professional typing teacher (my mother).

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT tomf@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                    @cloudhop A lot of people are absolutely horrified to discover I can't touch-type. Just never bothered to learn. Because it doesn't limit me.

                                    brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    brouhaha@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #66

                                    @TomF @cloudhop
                                    I'm glad I learned to touch-type. At the time (around 1977), my junior high school actively discouraged boys from taking typing class, because that was "women's work". I was already using computers by hunt-and-peck typing, but my motivation wasn't primarily about speeding up typing. I was already well aware that a much greater portion of the process, and time spent on it, was thinking.

                                    brouhaha@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • brouhaha@mastodon.socialB brouhaha@mastodon.social

                                      @TomF @cloudhop
                                      I'm glad I learned to touch-type. At the time (around 1977), my junior high school actively discouraged boys from taking typing class, because that was "women's work". I was already using computers by hunt-and-peck typing, but my motivation wasn't primarily about speeding up typing. I was already well aware that a much greater portion of the process, and time spent on it, was thinking.

                                      brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      brouhaha@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      brouhaha@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #67

                                      @TomF @cloudhop
                                      I'd hoped that touch typing would reduce my cognitive load (though I didn't know that term), making it easier to concentrate on the programming, and less on the typing. It did that somewhat, although I had already gotten so good at hunt-and-peck that it really wasn't as much change as I'd expected.

                                      tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • interru@hooves.socialI interru@hooves.social

                                        @cloudhop@equestria.social

                                        Software development is no longer constrained by typing speed, but by how clearly engineers articulate intent.
                                        Writing code directly without AI articulates intent best. So, vibe coding is about articulating vague intent and hoping magic 8-ball fills the gaps im such a way that it covers your use case.

                                        krazov@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        krazov@mstdn.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        krazov@mstdn.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #68

                                        @interru @cloudhop Also, articulating that intent to LLM is done by typing, as well.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • brouhaha@mastodon.socialB brouhaha@mastodon.social

                                          @TomF @cloudhop
                                          I'd hoped that touch typing would reduce my cognitive load (though I didn't know that term), making it easier to concentrate on the programming, and less on the typing. It did that somewhat, although I had already gotten so good at hunt-and-peck that it really wasn't as much change as I'd expected.

                                          tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tomf@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #69

                                          @brouhaha @cloudhop Also, if you're writing code, all the punctuation means you're moving your hands almost as much as hunt-n-peck anyway.

                                          tomf@mastodon.gamedev.placeT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups