Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. If you have to do or participate in something in order to survive, it's not a privilege, right?

If you have to do or participate in something in order to survive, it's not a privilege, right?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
140 Posts 40 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • low@lgbtqia.spaceL low@lgbtqia.space

    @doppelgrau thank you @Tattie and @doppelgrau for your answers.

    I think I need to rethink the privileges topic.
    For me it was always "you look like/are i.e. white male => you have certain privileges", even if they come with downsides.

    Which is, at least how I understand it, what
    @faithisleaping has written.

    @revoluciana

    tattie@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
    tattie@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
    tattie@eldritch.cafe
    wrote last edited by
    #63

    @low yeah, quite a large chunk of what is written on privilege takes a framing of either comparing white men to white women, or white men to black men.

    There's a huge amount of unexplored territory wrt the experiences of other minorities, and intersectional identities.
    @doppelgrau @faithisleaping @revoluciana

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

      If you have to do or participate in something in order to survive, it's not a privilege, right? It can't possibly be? I feel like we've already established this. Am I wrong?

      kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
      kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
      kats@chaosfem.tw
      wrote last edited by
      #64

      @revoluciana Addressing the question as phrased: if only some people are granted the ability to do that thing, then being able to do it is a privilege, Whether you do it is a separate issue.
      As was pointed out elsewhere in the replies, privilege is something given to you (or not), not something you do.
      Even if it's the result of something you do, that privilege is a separate thing (and a different kind of thing) from those actions.

      Addressing the actual question: you're trying to reduce at least two different things into a single thing.
      Did I have male privilege? Absolutely.
      Did that life also damage me so badly that I may never again be able to work a job like that? Also yes.
      These things aren't fungible, nor do they cancel out. They're both true.

      That privilege was conferred on me as a function of being perceived as a white man by those around me. It was not something I requested, or something I did. I learned to maintain that position by performing some approximation of the right kind of masculinity, sure - and now I'm trying to recover from what that did to me, on top of the rest.

      Coming back to the original question, let me throw you a related question: is it morally right to deceive people (possibly including yourself) in the course of obtaining a privilege that's necessary for survival?

      kats@chaosfem.twK 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

        If you have to do or participate in something in order to survive, it's not a privilege, right? It can't possibly be? I feel like we've already established this. Am I wrong?

        asuyuia@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
        asuyuia@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
        asuyuia@toot.cat
        wrote last edited by
        #65

        @revoluciana I will be honest I didn't read all the replies (or even most of them there are a lot) and it is a complex topic but there are protections that come with just being born male. You are less likely to get certain actions against you and even your voice carries more weight. That would be considered privileges.

        Then we have the aspects of we can't even be ourselves, we live in the deepest pits of despair hating everything about ourselves when to some we have the winning lottery ticket.

        This is a major problem of our world and lack of equality. People don't see that the "winning" ticket is actually one that wins us depression, self hatred and so much wrong with ourselves because it prevents us being happy. So we have the wrong kind of privilege. The privilege of power not the privilege of happiness which you can easily argue is not really privilege. Just like so many men are crushed by the weight of the world because they are men.

        Man or woman, boy or girl, both are a blessing and a curse but the biggest curse is not matching the one you were assigned. Everyone is hurt by the system but I do think there is protection and thus privilege in being born a certain way. You are safer, you have more power as a default and you don't have to fight as much but even in that system if you are a cis male it comes with great cost. You have to be strong, you can't show emotions as much (except anger which is a major problem), you can't talk about your feelings, you can't truly build a support network. You have all the strengths and weaknesses even if you won the dice role.

        There is even privilege in being straight instead of gay, straight instead of ace, straight instead of anything else. The lessening of burdens. Is that not what privilege is?

        If I was born in a very rich family I would be seen as highly privileged I might never have to work in my life and have a life of luxury, is that not privilege? But even in that I could be isolated, have no one I could truly trust, have people that would happily murder me for the money I carry. So is it not also a curse too?

        Privilege is a vague concept. There are benefits to being born in certain ways or with certain things but that doesn't mean it is right for you. A poor farmer who knows nothing can be happier and more fulfilled than someone with the world at their finger tips. They have the privilege of being able to have happiness they can hold born of ignorance and yet also simplicity. They don't have to worry about the wider world.

        I guess yes, there is privilege, and there is burden from it too. Is it privilege if the negatives outweight the positives? That's the idea here. I think in some cases someone with vasts amount of money is always going to be privileged because they can throw resources at their problems even if their problems are moeny itself. Does a trans woman have male privilege before coming out? I could easily argue yes but I could also see the argument for no.

        What price turns privilege into surival? What turns privilege into a curse. Going by my teenage years I would argue it kepts me safe in ways but also broke me. I wouldn't say I felt the privilege but just interactions went better because of it. I gained enough bonuses even if it was what was destroying me.

        It isn't some scale that can be balanced. It isn't some grand equation. Privilege is the wrong word here because there is more to it than what we gain and at what price but yes, unfortunately we gained benefits even if we were basically "blessed with suck"...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kats@chaosfem.twK kats@chaosfem.tw

          @revoluciana Addressing the question as phrased: if only some people are granted the ability to do that thing, then being able to do it is a privilege, Whether you do it is a separate issue.
          As was pointed out elsewhere in the replies, privilege is something given to you (or not), not something you do.
          Even if it's the result of something you do, that privilege is a separate thing (and a different kind of thing) from those actions.

          Addressing the actual question: you're trying to reduce at least two different things into a single thing.
          Did I have male privilege? Absolutely.
          Did that life also damage me so badly that I may never again be able to work a job like that? Also yes.
          These things aren't fungible, nor do they cancel out. They're both true.

          That privilege was conferred on me as a function of being perceived as a white man by those around me. It was not something I requested, or something I did. I learned to maintain that position by performing some approximation of the right kind of masculinity, sure - and now I'm trying to recover from what that did to me, on top of the rest.

          Coming back to the original question, let me throw you a related question: is it morally right to deceive people (possibly including yourself) in the course of obtaining a privilege that's necessary for survival?

          kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
          kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
          kats@chaosfem.tw
          wrote last edited by
          #66

          @revoluciana Something about the way you phrased this kept tugging at my mind.

          Are you feeling guilt over it, and looking for absolution? IMO, it's an Original Sin deal: we didn't ask for it, and we weren't given a choice.

          revoluciana@chaosfem.twR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bri7@social.treehouse.systemsB bri7@social.treehouse.systems

            @revoluciana i just feel like it’s the final word: do people go around asking gay people how great all that straight passing privilege was?

            revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
            revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
            revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
            wrote last edited by
            #67

            @bri7 I feel the same way. And yet people in this thread are telling me that's somehow different and I still only see the same as you see here.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

              I'm going to go to sleep now and mull over this some more tomorrow.

              Thank you to everyone trying to help me see what I don't see and/or engaging with what I do see.

              sous_mon_masque@eldritch.cafeS This user is from outside of this forum
              sous_mon_masque@eldritch.cafeS This user is from outside of this forum
              sous_mon_masque@eldritch.cafe
              wrote last edited by
              #68

              @revoluciana

              For me, it is a lot of big or small things.
              All grouped under "male privilege".

              Nobody told me to not do science studies.

              My salary was a in-between, bad for a man, good for a woman. (Now it is woman-range, even when I'm not out at work).

              I was sexually assaulted. But only once ?

              When I'm at ease, I still talk too much, cutting other women more than they cut me.

              So, I don't see all that as a "big single package".

              BUT nearly everytime somebody tell me about my supposed "male privilege", it is oppressive AND it is false according to my personnal life..

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • joscelyntransient@chaosfem.twJ joscelyntransient@chaosfem.tw

                @revoluciana @faithisleaping there is actually a really nuanced exploration of this topic I’ve wanted to do, but been wary to put in public writing because of how heated people get around this, and how quickly people assume the worst about a person allowing for any room to talk about “male socialization” or “male privilege” in trans women’s lives.

                If I’m honest about myself, there are ways I am very confident male privilege and being “socialized male” shaped me and my life in important ways, some mostly beneficial (though some deeply costly). But it also didn’t operate the way that many people probably assume, and it often wasn’t a cost/benefit proposition, but rather a thing that shapes behavior and life patterns.
                Anyway, I should go to bed rather than disk horsing. Sorry for probably being messy and careless with some words here

                revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                wrote last edited by
                #69

                @JoscelynTransient @faithisleaping

                You're wonderful (as are you, too Faith). All of what I'm saying is in good faith (no pun intended), and I know yours is, too. 💜

                I can see how it would seem like I'm concerned with oppression olympics given the topic, but I assure you that's not my point of concern. My point of concern, oddly enough since you brought it up, is similar to the "male socialization" issue.

                The arguments that we have/had male privilege and "male socialization" (which I also am not a proponent of this view), is that these are the basis of the same points that are used by TERFs to deny us our womanhood, to deny us our spaces. It's the same reason why a queer organization won't hire trans women and only hire trans mascs and other AFAB queer people.

                These same arguments are all of the reasons why even in so many queer spaces, let alone in the wider world, we are separated and blocked.

                Like, it's not about oppression olympics, but again, I can see why it would look that way. It's the practical matter of using the language of original sin in order to lord over us that we'll never be real women (and perhaps more significantly, that we will always be men) because of our privilege and so-called socialization.

                I think Julia Serrano explains so many of the effects better in the why are we denied the closet piece: https://juliaserano.medium.com/why-are-amab-trans-people-denied-the-closet-7fd5c740ce30

                This is more to the heart of my point.

                deirdre@corteximplant.comD revoluciana@chaosfem.twR 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • duchessofsnork@musicians.todayD duchessofsnork@musicians.today

                  @revoluciana Is calling it "male passing privilege" better? I passed as a guy for a long time. Long enough and well enough that I still struggle with imposter syndrome as a trans woman.

                  Because I passed, I didn't get bullied in high school, was able to pursue a male-coded career without harassment, and live a relatively comfortable life. I think the extent of these things are because I have "male-passing privilege".

                  Is there a price? Oh yes. But I see it as separate from the benefits.

                  revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                  revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                  revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                  wrote last edited by
                  #70

                  @DuchessOfSnork ill think on that. My gut tells me it's still a problem, but I do think there's something there for me to consider, especially as I did not pass well and it absolutely had consequences.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • natasha@lgbtqia.spaceN natasha@lgbtqia.space

                    @revoluciana I see your point and I think I agree.

                    Another thing that proves the point is that trans persons are ready to give up on their socially acquired priviledges to be themselves.

                    As I use to say - I'd never take an hypotetetic pill that could transform me in a cis men, that could help me have all the cis priviledges. It's not about privileges.

                    And thanks for this discussion, I liked to be a part of it 😎

                    revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                    revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                    revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                    wrote last edited by
                    #71

                    @natasha thank you! I appreciate the discussion, too. I'm worried I'm coming off as combative to some, but I'm truly trying to explore this in good faith. Thank you for this!

                    natasha@lgbtqia.spaceN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kats@chaosfem.twK kats@chaosfem.tw

                      @revoluciana Something about the way you phrased this kept tugging at my mind.

                      Are you feeling guilt over it, and looking for absolution? IMO, it's an Original Sin deal: we didn't ask for it, and we weren't given a choice.

                      revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                      revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                      revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                      wrote last edited by
                      #72

                      @KatS Not trying to ignore the rest of what you wrote, but trying to juggle at the moment. The reason it's of concern to me isn't about guilt, but yes, it is about the same original sin that TERFs use to deny us our humanity and our womanhood. The idea that we will always be men because of our male privilege and so-called male socialization. It has practical effects even in queer spaces because we're often not treated not for who we are, but for our perceived original sin.

                      Julia Serrano has a piece that touches on much of this and the effects:
                      https://juliaserano.medium.com/why-are-amab-trans-people-denied-the-closet-7fd5c740ce30

                      cordiallychloe@tech.lgbtC kats@chaosfem.twK 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                        If you have to do or participate in something in order to survive, it's not a privilege, right? It can't possibly be? I feel like we've already established this. Am I wrong?

                        thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                        thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zone
                        wrote last edited by
                        #73

                        @revoluciana@chaosfem.tw Privilege is a hugely nuanced thing to discuss. Pre coming out, I was definitely privileged by being recognized as typical man. When I said something, it was definitely heard; it was assumed I had certain competences. But since I was not a cis man, even if I did not know, keeping up that appearance came at a price that for a long time I wasn't even aware I was paying.
                        That applies to late diagnosis of neurodivergence, as well, in the form of neurodivergent burnout, when at some point your nervous system simply breaks down under the strain of an internalized mask that you made at the cost of knowing who you are, what you are, and your needs.
                        It even applies to discovering asexuality - I am not repulsed, but I do not feel any of the things that are assumed to come with sex. So while I can perform the rituals of allosexuality, there was always the sneaking feeling that something was deeply wrong, which did ruin at least one relationship for me.

                        Being assumed to be part of a privileged group while not being part of that group is ownership of a white elephant: you enjoy the standing that comes with it, but there's a good chance that the upkeep will ruin you sooner or later.

                        That comes on top of "having privilege" not meaning "being absolutely impervious to certain detriments". Being listened to doesn't mean not being dismissed, just someone taking a moment to dismiss you explicitely. Being seen as functional doesn't mean you are. Being able to have a normal sex life doesn't mean it is.

                        In the same vein, discrimination doesn't mean someone being explicitely, personally awful to you - your doctor can be personally the most awesome person to you and move mountains, but if they simply don't know aspects of trans specific healthcare because they are not studied, the transphobia in their healthcare is still evident. Inability to spot melanoma in a black person doesn't mean the doctor is racist, but the system that didn't teach them the difference from presentation in white skin is.

                        thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zoneT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                          @natasha thank you! I appreciate the discussion, too. I'm worried I'm coming off as combative to some, but I'm truly trying to explore this in good faith. Thank you for this!

                          natasha@lgbtqia.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                          natasha@lgbtqia.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                          natasha@lgbtqia.space
                          wrote last edited by
                          #74

                          @revoluciana there's nothing wrong in being combative. If you want of course.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zoneT thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zone

                            @revoluciana@chaosfem.tw Privilege is a hugely nuanced thing to discuss. Pre coming out, I was definitely privileged by being recognized as typical man. When I said something, it was definitely heard; it was assumed I had certain competences. But since I was not a cis man, even if I did not know, keeping up that appearance came at a price that for a long time I wasn't even aware I was paying.
                            That applies to late diagnosis of neurodivergence, as well, in the form of neurodivergent burnout, when at some point your nervous system simply breaks down under the strain of an internalized mask that you made at the cost of knowing who you are, what you are, and your needs.
                            It even applies to discovering asexuality - I am not repulsed, but I do not feel any of the things that are assumed to come with sex. So while I can perform the rituals of allosexuality, there was always the sneaking feeling that something was deeply wrong, which did ruin at least one relationship for me.

                            Being assumed to be part of a privileged group while not being part of that group is ownership of a white elephant: you enjoy the standing that comes with it, but there's a good chance that the upkeep will ruin you sooner or later.

                            That comes on top of "having privilege" not meaning "being absolutely impervious to certain detriments". Being listened to doesn't mean not being dismissed, just someone taking a moment to dismiss you explicitely. Being seen as functional doesn't mean you are. Being able to have a normal sex life doesn't mean it is.

                            In the same vein, discrimination doesn't mean someone being explicitely, personally awful to you - your doctor can be personally the most awesome person to you and move mountains, but if they simply don't know aspects of trans specific healthcare because they are not studied, the transphobia in their healthcare is still evident. Inability to spot melanoma in a black person doesn't mean the doctor is racist, but the system that didn't teach them the difference from presentation in white skin is.

                            thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                            thatfrisiangirlish@blahaj.zone
                            wrote last edited by
                            #75

                            @revoluciana@chaosfem.tw What I'm getting at is, systems behave differently from individuals. Being privileged doesn't translate cleanly to personal advantages.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                              I know people are trying to explain something to me with nuance, and I'm truly not trying to be a jerk, but all I keep hearing is that the violence we experience as trans women is actually privilege. But not just any privilege, but specifically male privilege. Because we are men. Or at least because people think we are. Which is its own privilege. And we should be so privileged to live through this violence in order to get *benefits* that make our lives easier (at this point we disregard the violence).

                              I'm just not buying it. Having the effects of our literal torture, self sacrifice, and violence called privilege is just not making its way to me.

                              deirdre@corteximplant.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                              deirdre@corteximplant.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                              deirdre@corteximplant.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #76

                              @revoluciana 🤷 it’s both, all of the above

                              like i get what you mean, and in particular it’s a tough thing to address because 99% of the conversations around it are either bad-faith or ignorant. and i think calling it “male privilege” is a deep misrepresentation, we desperately need a better term. because yeah, i don’t think a lot of pre-transition transfems actually have access to what we typically think of as “male privilege”—at the very least not to the same degree as average cis men.

                              BUT, for 37 years i never had to worry about walking alone at night. never had to worry about ordering food delivery and getting a creep delivery guy. didn’t think about people putting things in my drinks. didn’t text my friends to let them know my date didn’t murder me. never got catcalled. never got grabbed. never owned pepper spray or thought about self-defense training. and i didn’t have to start thinking about any of this as a literal child the way a lot of cis women are forced to.

                              are our pre-transition lives, on the whole, privileged as a result of our presumed gender? no, i don’t think so. but do we have access to specific privilege in specific contexts as a result of our perceived gender? well, yeah, and i don’t really see any other way to view it. like, all the pain and trauma and shit that we go through as a result of growing up in cisnormativity, yeah that’s demonstrably extremely harmful…but i just don’t buy that the violence we are exempted from is a form of violence against us.

                              and despite that our pre-transition lives are generally not marked by a net positive of privilege, i think it’s *really* important to acknowledge and examine and critique the specific ways we do access privilege during that part of our lives. failure to do so leaves us ill-equipped to examine other kinds of privilege and oppression.

                              revoluciana@chaosfem.twR 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • deirdre@corteximplant.comD deirdre@corteximplant.com

                                @revoluciana 🤷 it’s both, all of the above

                                like i get what you mean, and in particular it’s a tough thing to address because 99% of the conversations around it are either bad-faith or ignorant. and i think calling it “male privilege” is a deep misrepresentation, we desperately need a better term. because yeah, i don’t think a lot of pre-transition transfems actually have access to what we typically think of as “male privilege”—at the very least not to the same degree as average cis men.

                                BUT, for 37 years i never had to worry about walking alone at night. never had to worry about ordering food delivery and getting a creep delivery guy. didn’t think about people putting things in my drinks. didn’t text my friends to let them know my date didn’t murder me. never got catcalled. never got grabbed. never owned pepper spray or thought about self-defense training. and i didn’t have to start thinking about any of this as a literal child the way a lot of cis women are forced to.

                                are our pre-transition lives, on the whole, privileged as a result of our presumed gender? no, i don’t think so. but do we have access to specific privilege in specific contexts as a result of our perceived gender? well, yeah, and i don’t really see any other way to view it. like, all the pain and trauma and shit that we go through as a result of growing up in cisnormativity, yeah that’s demonstrably extremely harmful…but i just don’t buy that the violence we are exempted from is a form of violence against us.

                                and despite that our pre-transition lives are generally not marked by a net positive of privilege, i think it’s *really* important to acknowledge and examine and critique the specific ways we do access privilege during that part of our lives. failure to do so leaves us ill-equipped to examine other kinds of privilege and oppression.

                                revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                                revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                                revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                                wrote last edited by
                                #77

                                @deirdre Thank you for this. This is probably the best explanation to at least get me much closer to seeing this perspective in a much clearer light, even if I'm still trying to sort through it.

                                Part of me is wondering if Mulan was experiencing male privilege when she went off to war.

                                Or, because of the work I've been a part of, I often come back to this: if the Afghan girls who pose as boys, in all aspects of life, so that the women in their family have an escort in public just so they can go to the market without being murdered by the Taliban (it's illegal to do so without a male chaperone, even if that chaperone is a child), if these girls are experiencing male privilege. They're forced into posing for survival, but if they're found out, it's dangerous. Is it male privilege for a cis girl to pretend to be a boy, to "live as a boy", to survive under the threat of the Taliban, and to also worry about getting caught? I can't with a straight face call this privilege (let alone male privilege), only survival.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                                  @JoscelynTransient @faithisleaping

                                  You're wonderful (as are you, too Faith). All of what I'm saying is in good faith (no pun intended), and I know yours is, too. 💜

                                  I can see how it would seem like I'm concerned with oppression olympics given the topic, but I assure you that's not my point of concern. My point of concern, oddly enough since you brought it up, is similar to the "male socialization" issue.

                                  The arguments that we have/had male privilege and "male socialization" (which I also am not a proponent of this view), is that these are the basis of the same points that are used by TERFs to deny us our womanhood, to deny us our spaces. It's the same reason why a queer organization won't hire trans women and only hire trans mascs and other AFAB queer people.

                                  These same arguments are all of the reasons why even in so many queer spaces, let alone in the wider world, we are separated and blocked.

                                  Like, it's not about oppression olympics, but again, I can see why it would look that way. It's the practical matter of using the language of original sin in order to lord over us that we'll never be real women (and perhaps more significantly, that we will always be men) because of our privilege and so-called socialization.

                                  I think Julia Serrano explains so many of the effects better in the why are we denied the closet piece: https://juliaserano.medium.com/why-are-amab-trans-people-denied-the-closet-7fd5c740ce30

                                  This is more to the heart of my point.

                                  deirdre@corteximplant.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  deirdre@corteximplant.comD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  deirdre@corteximplant.com
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #78

                                  @revoluciana @JoscelynTransient @faithisleaping see, this feels like a totally separate topic—related but separate. because this feels less about whether or not we actually experience pre-transition gender privilege (tricky and nuanced!) and a lot more about how the perception of male privilege is weaponized against us by bigots (simple and straightforward!) and the tactics we might use to mitigate.

                                  also, i would need to reread that particular article to comment more specifically on it, but to be perfectly honest i don’t think serrano has very good takes on this general area of trans discourse.

                                  revoluciana@chaosfem.twR 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • deirdre@corteximplant.comD deirdre@corteximplant.com

                                    @revoluciana @JoscelynTransient @faithisleaping see, this feels like a totally separate topic—related but separate. because this feels less about whether or not we actually experience pre-transition gender privilege (tricky and nuanced!) and a lot more about how the perception of male privilege is weaponized against us by bigots (simple and straightforward!) and the tactics we might use to mitigate.

                                    also, i would need to reread that particular article to comment more specifically on it, but to be perfectly honest i don’t think serrano has very good takes on this general area of trans discourse.

                                    revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #79

                                    @deirdre @JoscelynTransient @faithisleaping

                                    I think all of that is fair, including about Serrano (I also don't agree with everything in this particular piece of hers, but I think that she makes a lot of really good points that are germane to this discussion).

                                    And maybe I need to see if I can separate these things, like you say. It's possible that they're separate, but it's difficult because the *only* time I have ever seen the so-called male privilege of trans women brought up is to weaponizen it against us in order to call us men and deny our womanhood or even proximity to it. I don't think there's any other situation I've ever seen where it's ever been relevant to anything except as a cudgel against us.

                                    I'll see what I can do to parse it out because you do have a point. I am not sure if it can be parsed or not. It's tangly if nothing else.

                                    faithisleaping@anarres.familyF 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                                      In reply to the question of privilege:

                                      revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      revoluciana@chaosfem.twR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      revoluciana@chaosfem.tw
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #80

                                      Do Bacha Posh have male privilege?

                                      Bacha Posh are Afghan girls who are *forced* to act and "live as" boys for the sake of her family, to act as an escort for the women in her family, to access education, to keep her family from starving, and other variety of reasons.

                                      If she is forced to do this against her will in order to access the privilege only given to men, or even for survival, then does that automatically mean she has male privilege?

                                      dlakelan@mastodon.sdf.orgD ruthoday2@chaosfem.twR spacekatia@girlcock.clubS 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                                        Here's what I'm getting at.

                                        Trans women don't experience male privilege before coming out. It's not a privilege if you have to sacrifice everything you are in order to obtain it. And in the case of trans women, we don't even sacrifice who we are in order to obtain male privilege, we do it just to survive. I'm having such a difficult time believing it's privilege when it's bought and paid for, especially at such a high price.

                                        elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        elight@tenforward.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                        elight@tenforward.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #81

                                        @revoluciana @pathfinder to be clear, not a negation. Forming a second theory by leveraging your first.

                                        I read this and I can see substituting "autistics" for "trans women" and "unmasking" for "coming out" and it reads just as true. Many of us have similarly struggled to live in this world that was not built for us.

                                        💜

                                        revoluciana@chaosfem.twR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • revoluciana@chaosfem.twR revoluciana@chaosfem.tw

                                          @KatS Not trying to ignore the rest of what you wrote, but trying to juggle at the moment. The reason it's of concern to me isn't about guilt, but yes, it is about the same original sin that TERFs use to deny us our humanity and our womanhood. The idea that we will always be men because of our male privilege and so-called male socialization. It has practical effects even in queer spaces because we're often not treated not for who we are, but for our perceived original sin.

                                          Julia Serrano has a piece that touches on much of this and the effects:
                                          https://juliaserano.medium.com/why-are-amab-trans-people-denied-the-closet-7fd5c740ce30

                                          cordiallychloe@tech.lgbtC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cordiallychloe@tech.lgbtC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cordiallychloe@tech.lgbt
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #82

                                          @revoluciana @KatS

                                          Reading the first couple paragraphs of this article, I realized I actually saw that happen.

                                          On the newest season of The Traitors, one of the guys tells another guy he's a "really good actor" (in a snide way). The other guy actually had just gone through a whole scandal bc he was engaged to a woman and then cheated on her with a man before eventually publicly coming out as gay.

                                          The man had been in the closet his whole life. And he shot right back about it to shut the first guy down.

                                          Everyone in that moment recognized what an awful thing the suggestion was; that he was "acting" and "privileged" for being able to "pretend" for so long.

                                          Fascinating to see on TV.

                                          revoluciana@chaosfem.twR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups