Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. “software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can.

“software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
147 Posts 75 Posters 27 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL losttourist@social.chatty.monster

    @perigee @zzt @MrBerard I will just repeat what Its FOSS said when the feature was merged:

    In simple words, this is something that adds a new, optional field that can then be used by other open source projects like xdg-desktop-portal to build age verification compliance on top of, without systemd itself doing anything with the data or making it mandatory to provide

    So yeah, that is what this change looks like, but this won't be stopping the haters and conspiracy theorists from making wild accusations, of course.

    I don't know which hat you're wearing today ("hater" or "conspiracy theorist") but I do hope you enjoy the look.

    mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mrberard@mastodon.acm.org
    wrote last edited by
    #73

    @losttourist @perigee @zzt

    I feel my asking a naive question has landed me into what I'll euphemistically describe as a 'heated debate'.

    I'm kinda seeing both sides, on the one hand slippery slope arguments have questionable validity ('did you know copper wires can enable a surveillance network?') but on the other, if this change doesn't constitute a move worth opposing to you, what event down the line would you actually oppose?

    Oh, and folks, cooling the tone would be welcome here.

    losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL perigee@rage.loveP 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • kirtai@tech.lgbtK kirtai@tech.lgbt

      @zzt
      When they start bringing up lisp machines we'll know the apocalypse is nigh.

      jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwz@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwz@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #74

      @kirtai @zzt Lispns didn't have any of that fascist "process isolation", we had one address space and we LIKED it that way. "Oh oh this page 'belongs' to me." Ok colonizer.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

        “it’s just a column in a database, aren’t you being dramatic” thanks fucker, believe it or not I know how software works and I know perfectly well the type of horrid crap we can build on top of a simple backend if it’s encapsulated in the right type of system

        haui@mastodon.giftedmc.comH This user is from outside of this forum
        haui@mastodon.giftedmc.comH This user is from outside of this forum
        haui@mastodon.giftedmc.com
        wrote last edited by
        #75

        @zzt
        One could ask ibm how they implemented the stamp cards for the holocaust. Yet this company still exists, let alone has gotten any form of punishment. Its the same logic for any nazi despite a select few for a show trial. The western states have systematically shielded the nazis from prosecution, same as they do now.

        The issue is not the people saying "what should i do, I'm alone." Its the people who say "no mate, the nazis never lost control is a conspiracy theory."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM mrberard@mastodon.acm.org

          @losttourist @perigee @zzt

          I feel my asking a naive question has landed me into what I'll euphemistically describe as a 'heated debate'.

          I'm kinda seeing both sides, on the one hand slippery slope arguments have questionable validity ('did you know copper wires can enable a surveillance network?') but on the other, if this change doesn't constitute a move worth opposing to you, what event down the line would you actually oppose?

          Oh, and folks, cooling the tone would be welcome here.

          losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL This user is from outside of this forum
          losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL This user is from outside of this forum
          losttourist@social.chatty.monster
          wrote last edited by
          #76

          @MrBerard @perigee @zzt

          "What event down the line would you actually oppose?"

          I can think of several places where I'd say a line had been crossed:

          • any requirement by a distro to make adding that data mandatory (easy to resolve, simply switch distros)
          • any requirement by a distro to provide external verification for the arbitrary collection of digits that gets stored in a DoB field

          The verification I think is key. As an example, the UNIX adduser command has prompted for things like "Real Name", "Phone Number", "Room Number" for decades. Nobody actually provides that information. This, honestly, is not conceptually different.

          mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL losttourist@social.chatty.monster

            @MrBerard @perigee @zzt

            "What event down the line would you actually oppose?"

            I can think of several places where I'd say a line had been crossed:

            • any requirement by a distro to make adding that data mandatory (easy to resolve, simply switch distros)
            • any requirement by a distro to provide external verification for the arbitrary collection of digits that gets stored in a DoB field

            The verification I think is key. As an example, the UNIX adduser command has prompted for things like "Real Name", "Phone Number", "Room Number" for decades. Nobody actually provides that information. This, honestly, is not conceptually different.

            mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
            mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
            mrberard@mastodon.acm.org
            wrote last edited by
            #77

            @losttourist @perigee @zzt

            Hahaha 'room number' is brill. They stopped shy of 'name of your frat'!

            See, I had a hunch that verification was the real tricky point.
            But when this does happen (because it will), not having this DB field verified will mean plenty of stuff can't be done on the alt. distros which do not have it.
            Which is not a dichotomy that can be induced if the move was resisted upstream of that?

            Or is this an externality, like the problem is w/ services mandating verified age?

            mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM mrberard@mastodon.acm.org

              @losttourist @perigee @zzt

              Hahaha 'room number' is brill. They stopped shy of 'name of your frat'!

              See, I had a hunch that verification was the real tricky point.
              But when this does happen (because it will), not having this DB field verified will mean plenty of stuff can't be done on the alt. distros which do not have it.
              Which is not a dichotomy that can be induced if the move was resisted upstream of that?

              Or is this an externality, like the problem is w/ services mandating verified age?

              mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
              mrberard@mastodon.acm.org
              wrote last edited by
              #78

              @losttourist @perigee @zzt

              Like 'as long as we will have VPNs and jurisdiction where age verification isn't mandatory, we don't have to worry about the creep of online services being age-(meaning ID) gated?

              mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM mrberard@mastodon.acm.org

                @losttourist @perigee @zzt

                Like 'as long as we will have VPNs and jurisdiction where age verification isn't mandatory, we don't have to worry about the creep of online services being age-(meaning ID) gated?

                mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrberard@mastodon.acm.org
                wrote last edited by
                #79

                @losttourist @perigee @zzt

                Just to inject some levity with a glib comment, maybe I won't matter, as surely a simple cognitive test will be able to sort people who entered secondary education after 2023 from the ones who don't?

                I guess annoyingly, this doesn't work once brain-rotten kids are all adults, but I'm sure by then there'll be another cognitive thalidomide whose exposure test will be able to de facto tell age.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                  “software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can. corporations do it constantly and I really doubt any of them will drop linux if it doesn’t comply with a set of godawful fascist age verification laws. historically one of the forms of pushback against unjust laws is to show some basic fucking solidarity and do nothing to assist in their enforcement because it really isn’t practical to sue everybody, but unfortunately solidarity is alien to most of these computer fuckers

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  bria@nerdculture.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #80

                  @zzt
                  I tend to disagree

                  Most of the "computer fuckers" are against the censorship and enforcement of such law.

                  But systemd , push by RedHat and Poettering (which have done no good software, remember pulseaudio...) has, I don't know how, a big influence in many distribution board.

                  Systemd was adopted/forced by distribution even with a big opposition and not being technically sound when adopted.

                  All the pr to remove this code of "age" into systemd was shoot down by the same.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                    “software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can. corporations do it constantly and I really doubt any of them will drop linux if it doesn’t comply with a set of godawful fascist age verification laws. historically one of the forms of pushback against unjust laws is to show some basic fucking solidarity and do nothing to assist in their enforcement because it really isn’t practical to sue everybody, but unfortunately solidarity is alien to most of these computer fuckers

                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    ratsnakegames@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #81

                    @zzt i wish some major Linux vendors just had the gender-neutral genitalia to say "if this law passes we'll withdraw from the US market".

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL losttourist@social.chatty.monster

                      @zzt @MrBerard "age verification code" is a bit of a grandiose term for a field that can store a value and retrieve a value. There is nothing anywhere in systemd that determines how (or even if) a distro decides what value to put into that field.

                      Even if it does get used by a distro, it is likely to be something along the lines of

                      "please enter your age. don't lie because that would be naughty > "

                      when creating a new user account.

                      anhedonie@chaosfem.twA This user is from outside of this forum
                      anhedonie@chaosfem.twA This user is from outside of this forum
                      anhedonie@chaosfem.tw
                      wrote last edited by
                      #82

                      @losttourist @zzt @MrBerard you can't call yourself a LGBTQ+ ally and defend one of the fundamental building blocks of worldwide queer youth censorship, that's not how it works my dude

                      mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                        “software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can. corporations do it constantly and I really doubt any of them will drop linux if it doesn’t comply with a set of godawful fascist age verification laws. historically one of the forms of pushback against unjust laws is to show some basic fucking solidarity and do nothing to assist in their enforcement because it really isn’t practical to sue everybody, but unfortunately solidarity is alien to most of these computer fuckers

                        weirdwriter@caneandable.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        weirdwriter@caneandable.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                        weirdwriter@caneandable.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #83

                        @zzt I wish I could boost this a billion times! Thank you for all of this!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                          “software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can. corporations do it constantly and I really doubt any of them will drop linux if it doesn’t comply with a set of godawful fascist age verification laws. historically one of the forms of pushback against unjust laws is to show some basic fucking solidarity and do nothing to assist in their enforcement because it really isn’t practical to sue everybody, but unfortunately solidarity is alien to most of these computer fuckers

                          exception@mastodon.savvy.chE This user is from outside of this forum
                          exception@mastodon.savvy.chE This user is from outside of this forum
                          exception@mastodon.savvy.ch
                          wrote last edited by
                          #84

                          @zzt Let's just block California on all download pages and mirrors of all distributions. Then the can age verify all day.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                            “software can’t just ignore laws it doesn’t like” it literally can. corporations do it constantly and I really doubt any of them will drop linux if it doesn’t comply with a set of godawful fascist age verification laws. historically one of the forms of pushback against unjust laws is to show some basic fucking solidarity and do nothing to assist in their enforcement because it really isn’t practical to sue everybody, but unfortunately solidarity is alien to most of these computer fuckers

                            kwramm@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kwramm@mastodon.gamedev.placeK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kwramm@mastodon.gamedev.place
                            wrote last edited by
                            #85

                            @zzt <insert stupid non enforcable US inspired EULA terms in software sold in the EU>

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • losttourist@social.chatty.monsterL losttourist@social.chatty.monster

                              @zzt @MrBerard "age verification code" is a bit of a grandiose term for a field that can store a value and retrieve a value. There is nothing anywhere in systemd that determines how (or even if) a distro decides what value to put into that field.

                              Even if it does get used by a distro, it is likely to be something along the lines of

                              "please enter your age. don't lie because that would be naughty > "

                              when creating a new user account.

                              trisweb@m.trisweb.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              trisweb@m.trisweb.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              trisweb@m.trisweb.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #86

                              @losttourist @zzt @MrBerard if it’s so pointless then let’s not do it

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

                                “it’s just a column in a database” said presumably a full grown adult whose ability to live under capitalism is a column in their bank’s database

                                mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mabande@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #87

                                @zzt "It's just a column in a database" said someone at IBM back in '33

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • anhedonie@chaosfem.twA anhedonie@chaosfem.tw

                                  @losttourist @zzt @MrBerard you can't call yourself a LGBTQ+ ally and defend one of the fundamental building blocks of worldwide queer youth censorship, that's not how it works my dude

                                  mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mrberard@mastodon.acm.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #88

                                  @anhedonie @losttourist @zzt

                                  How fundamental do we go in the building blocks? Cause by that token, it is the very existence of the concept of date of birth that's fundamental here.

                                  This is just a question of how low in the stack of fundations-superstructure intervention is appropriate to protect privacy and free access to information.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sabik@rants.auS sabik@rants.au

                                    @zzt @jwz
                                    Famously, Jewish religion was "just a column in the database" in Nazi-occupied France

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Carmille

                                    hakona@im.alstadheim.noH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    hakona@im.alstadheim.noH This user is from outside of this forum
                                    hakona@im.alstadheim.no
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #89

                                    @sabik Came here to say this . A "J" in the upper right corner of a filing card can't hurt. Social security , employment , inmates , all kinds of records had that convenient open space.
                                    @zzt @jwz

                                    rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM mrberard@mastodon.acm.org

                                      @losttourist @perigee @zzt

                                      I feel my asking a naive question has landed me into what I'll euphemistically describe as a 'heated debate'.

                                      I'm kinda seeing both sides, on the one hand slippery slope arguments have questionable validity ('did you know copper wires can enable a surveillance network?') but on the other, if this change doesn't constitute a move worth opposing to you, what event down the line would you actually oppose?

                                      Oh, and folks, cooling the tone would be welcome here.

                                      perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      perigee@rage.loveP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      perigee@rage.love
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #90

                                      @MrBerard @losttourist @zzt my tone is cool. I'm not proposing accepting a slipshod solution because "it's not that bad". It's going to start not that bad and become terrible because we gave it an inch and it will take a mile. As others have said, now is the time to oppose it. Not when it's gotten a foothold.

                                      mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • perigee@rage.loveP perigee@rage.love

                                        @MrBerard @losttourist @zzt my tone is cool. I'm not proposing accepting a slipshod solution because "it's not that bad". It's going to start not that bad and become terrible because we gave it an inch and it will take a mile. As others have said, now is the time to oppose it. Not when it's gotten a foothold.

                                        mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mrberard@mastodon.acm.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mrberard@mastodon.acm.org
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #91

                                        @perigee @losttourist @zzt

                                        Okay. But why does this moment constitute the foothold?

                                        Isn't the problem political rather than technological? All jurisdictions are moving towards age verification systems that are problematic enough without having OS level DoB verification, if we stop the Linux thing (which admittedly seems very out of sync with the philosophy), these are still there.

                                        Sure, it's better if the Linux thing isn't, all things equal, but the foothold is a sociopolitical one?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • hakona@im.alstadheim.noH hakona@im.alstadheim.no

                                          @sabik Came here to say this . A "J" in the upper right corner of a filing card can't hurt. Social security , employment , inmates , all kinds of records had that convenient open space.
                                          @zzt @jwz

                                          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #92

                                          @hakona @sabik @zzt @jwz there's a reason the Venn diagram of eugenicists, "race scientists," AI boosters, and people who insist code is just 'incrementing variables' is just a circle.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups