Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Lots of people talking about buying solar panels.

Lots of people talking about buying solar panels.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
solarpunk
55 Posts 19 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

    @billiglarper @vgarzareyna all true. But if you're getting your advice on solar panel rating plausibility, you're not getting any of those, so the basics check stands. But yes. There are some edge cases.

    billiglarper@rollenspiel.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    billiglarper@rollenspiel.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    billiglarper@rollenspiel.social
    wrote last edited by
    #46

    @quixoticgeek @vgarzareyna

    Oh, absolutely. ~23% it will be for quite some time.

    Just trying to be positive by pointing out that this it's not a hard limit and technological innovation is possible.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • vgarzareyna@mstdn.mxV vgarzareyna@mstdn.mx

      @billiglarper @quixoticgeek :0 i guess there's not that much room for improvement then

      bloodripelives@federatedfandom.netB This user is from outside of this forum
      bloodripelives@federatedfandom.netB This user is from outside of this forum
      bloodripelives@federatedfandom.net
      wrote last edited by
      #47

      @vgarzareyna @billiglarper @quixoticgeek there isn't, but IMO the language of efficiency is a bit misleading when it comes to solar panels because we're using to thinking low efficiency = bad and needs fixing. That's true for fossil fuel technologies, where the energy put into the system is in a form that is rare, expensive and dangerous, so it matters a lot what percentage of that energy in is actually going to come out as useful work.

      Photons from the sky are ludicrously plentiful and free, so the trajectory of solar panel manufacture has generally been to not worry too much about pushing the limits on efficiency, and work instead on making them cheaper and cheaper. And it's worked, solar is now the world's cheapest energy source! The solar panels we already know how to make are GREAT, the improvement needed is nearly all in, well, political will. (And battery storage/grid stability, but that's just political will in a trenchcoat.)

      quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • bloodripelives@federatedfandom.netB bloodripelives@federatedfandom.net

        @vgarzareyna @billiglarper @quixoticgeek there isn't, but IMO the language of efficiency is a bit misleading when it comes to solar panels because we're using to thinking low efficiency = bad and needs fixing. That's true for fossil fuel technologies, where the energy put into the system is in a form that is rare, expensive and dangerous, so it matters a lot what percentage of that energy in is actually going to come out as useful work.

        Photons from the sky are ludicrously plentiful and free, so the trajectory of solar panel manufacture has generally been to not worry too much about pushing the limits on efficiency, and work instead on making them cheaper and cheaper. And it's worked, solar is now the world's cheapest energy source! The solar panels we already know how to make are GREAT, the improvement needed is nearly all in, well, political will. (And battery storage/grid stability, but that's just political will in a trenchcoat.)

        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
        quixoticgeek@social.v.st
        wrote last edited by
        #48

        @bloodripelives @vgarzareyna @billiglarper yep.. basically the only time we need to care about even greater efficiency than we have now is if your putting the panels on something moving, like a boat, plane, or space craft. But I'd you're doing that, you're getting advice from a nerd on fedi...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • billiglarper@rollenspiel.socialB billiglarper@rollenspiel.social

          @disorderlyf @quixoticgeek @annantidote @edavies

          The regulations for "balcony solar" in Canada might be different to Germany.

          Link Preview Image
          Plug-in balcony solar panels could mean cheaper power. But Canada needs to get on board first | CBC News

          How would you like to lower your electricity bill and help power your home using an abundant renewable energy source — the sun? There is an affordable, do-it-yourself solution for people who own houses, apartment renters and condo dwellers, that doesn't cost buckets of money or require any sort of tedious installation. But, it's not widely available or permitted in Canada yet.

          favicon

          CBC (www.cbc.ca)

          annantidote@chitter.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
          annantidote@chitter.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
          annantidote@chitter.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #49

          @billiglarper @disorderlyf @quixoticgeek @edavies maybe, and probably and thanks for the link, but i dont want to read german regulations (very detailed and complicated lingo) until i have an overview, specially of hardware, tech stuff and installation possibilities.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • vgarzareyna@mstdn.mxV vgarzareyna@mstdn.mx

            @quixoticgeek why only 20%?:0

            drj@typo.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drj@typo.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            drj@typo.social
            wrote last edited by
            #50

            @vgarzareyna @quixoticgeek plants are about 2%, so we're 10x on nature already. And plants are how you make wood chip or coal for burning.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social shared this topic
            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.st
              wrote last edited by
              #51

              @DavidPenington the reason I used this example, is one of the main areas where solar panel power rating is often inflated is on small portable setups for things like hiking, camping, etc... it might not be what you need to run your apartment on, but it may be enough to charge your phone when camping.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                wrote last edited by
                #52

                @HollieK72 @DavidPenington exactly. I just used an example of Amazon. The same maths works for any panel. So when you are a stack of 10 440w panel offered for sale for a good price. You can check the size with the maths I showed and see if they really are 440w panels or if someone is trying to scam you.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                  quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
                  quixoticgeek@social.v.st
                  wrote last edited by
                  #53

                  @HollieK72 @failedLyndonLaRouchite I'm out of characters...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                    Lots of people talking about buying solar panels. Alas if you look online there's a lot of retailers with all sorts of panels for sale, not all of which are honest. Want an easy way to check if the listed power output is plausible?
                    Example using a 50w panel listed on Amazon. It's 370x820mm.
                    Step 1 calculate the area in square meters. (0.37*0.82=0.3034)
                    Step 2 multiply by 1000w. (0.3034*1000=303.4)
                    Step 3 assume 20% efficiency and multiply (303.4x0.2=60.68)

                    60.68>50w. It's Plausible.

                    #SolarPunk

                    ginevracat@toot.communityG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ginevracat@toot.communityG This user is from outside of this forum
                    ginevracat@toot.community
                    wrote last edited by
                    #54

                    @quixoticgeek @ShaulaEvans That is GOOD info. Thank-you.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                      Lots of people talking about buying solar panels. Alas if you look online there's a lot of retailers with all sorts of panels for sale, not all of which are honest. Want an easy way to check if the listed power output is plausible?
                      Example using a 50w panel listed on Amazon. It's 370x820mm.
                      Step 1 calculate the area in square meters. (0.37*0.82=0.3034)
                      Step 2 multiply by 1000w. (0.3034*1000=303.4)
                      Step 3 assume 20% efficiency and multiply (303.4x0.2=60.68)

                      60.68>50w. It's Plausible.

                      #SolarPunk

                      kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kkarhan@c.im
                      wrote last edited by
                      #55

                      @quixoticgeek Just for a point of reference:

                      The average solar energy around the globe is 135W/h &m².

                      OFC that assumes nighttime and also uniform energy output, which isn't at higher lattitudes, so 270W/m² & h is the global average at daytime and >540W is closer to a sunny day.

                      So yeah, that number is well within the cards.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups