Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Well, well, well, Prof. Sam Lawler @sundogplanets have you seen this?

Well, well, well, Prof. Sam Lawler @sundogplanets have you seen this?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
spacexspacexipo
18 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

    Well, well, well, Prof. Sam Lawler @sundogplanets have you seen this?

    Paulus (@PaulusMc70@mastodon.social)

    SpaceX Quietly Admits to a Threat It Helped Create, and Can’t Stop https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/05/30/spacex-quietly-admits-to-a-threat-it-helped-create-and-cant-stop/

    favicon

    Mastodon (mastodon.social)

    "Buried deep in SpaceX’s freshly filed IPO paperwork..."

    "The pre-IPO disclosures lay it out cleanly. SpaceX warns that “the continued proliferation of satellite constellations in Low-Earth Orbit, as well as the risk of collisions with space debris or other spacecraft, could limit or impair our launch flexibility and satellite deployment.”

    more...

    1/

    #SpaceX #SpaceXIPO

    akasci@fosstodon.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    akasci@fosstodon.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
    akasci@fosstodon.org
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets

    SpaceX has made similar statements before. What they imply is that satellite constellations by other operators may raise the risk of collisions and space debris, not their own.

    They can use that argument to influence the FCC to block their competitor's systems.

    The stmt about "cascading collision event that renders our licensed orbits unusable for an extended period” is in the context of natural disasters,, cyberattacks, etc.

    SEC.gov | Your Request Originates from an Undeclared Automated Tool

    favicon

    (www.sec.gov)

    mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • akasci@fosstodon.orgA akasci@fosstodon.org

      @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets

      SpaceX has made similar statements before. What they imply is that satellite constellations by other operators may raise the risk of collisions and space debris, not their own.

      They can use that argument to influence the FCC to block their competitor's systems.

      The stmt about "cascading collision event that renders our licensed orbits unusable for an extended period” is in the context of natural disasters,, cyberattacks, etc.

      SEC.gov | Your Request Originates from an Undeclared Automated Tool

      favicon

      (www.sec.gov)

      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @AkaSci @sundogplanets

      Good points. Had not thought of using this rationale to pressure the FCC to block competitors. Nothing is surprising about these guys.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

        @sundogplanets

        And the kicker...

        "A worst-case scenario is flagged: a strike that could “trigger a cascading collision event that renders our licensed orbits, and potentially other orbits, unusable for an extended period."

        SpaceX S1: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm

        3/

        #SpaceX #SpaceXIPO

        phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP This user is from outside of this forum
        phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP This user is from outside of this forum
        phil_stevens@mastodon.nz
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets So the excitement will be finding out what gets vapourised faster: the Starlink constellation, or the retirement savings of millions of Americans.

        sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

          Well, well, well, Prof. Sam Lawler @sundogplanets have you seen this?

          Paulus (@PaulusMc70@mastodon.social)

          SpaceX Quietly Admits to a Threat It Helped Create, and Can’t Stop https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/05/30/spacex-quietly-admits-to-a-threat-it-helped-create-and-cant-stop/

          favicon

          Mastodon (mastodon.social)

          "Buried deep in SpaceX’s freshly filed IPO paperwork..."

          "The pre-IPO disclosures lay it out cleanly. SpaceX warns that “the continued proliferation of satellite constellations in Low-Earth Orbit, as well as the risk of collisions with space debris or other spacecraft, could limit or impair our launch flexibility and satellite deployment.”

          more...

          1/

          #SpaceX #SpaceXIPO

          aoai@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
          aoai@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
          aoai@mastodon.online
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets
          Well from the information available lately, humans in space is not a good long term goal. Going to Mars would not workout. Our kidneys don't like being in space. Our cluttered area around the low Earth orbit will make going to the moon or Mars impossible or very dangerous.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • akasci@fosstodon.orgA akasci@fosstodon.org

            @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets

            SpaceX has made similar statements before. What they imply is that satellite constellations by other operators may raise the risk of collisions and space debris, not their own.

            They can use that argument to influence the FCC to block their competitor's systems.

            The stmt about "cascading collision event that renders our licensed orbits unusable for an extended period” is in the context of natural disasters,, cyberattacks, etc.

            SEC.gov | Your Request Originates from an Undeclared Automated Tool

            favicon

            (www.sec.gov)

            marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
            marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
            marjolica@social.linux.pizza
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @AkaSci @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets AFAIK the FCC only control US businesses access to space. I understood that amongst others the Chinese also have plans...

            Link Preview Image
            Guowang - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            Noting also that Starlink is the only profitable bit of SpaceX (launching rockets and being an also run AI company are not) but clearly their exponential growth of satellite telecom is not going to continue as near-earth orbit saturates, so SpaceX as a whole is clearly enormously overvalued and the IPO is just a scam to allow Musk to cash out at the expense of Musk groupies and your pension investments tied up in Index Funds.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

              Well, well, well, Prof. Sam Lawler @sundogplanets have you seen this?

              Paulus (@PaulusMc70@mastodon.social)

              SpaceX Quietly Admits to a Threat It Helped Create, and Can’t Stop https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/05/30/spacex-quietly-admits-to-a-threat-it-helped-create-and-cant-stop/

              favicon

              Mastodon (mastodon.social)

              "Buried deep in SpaceX’s freshly filed IPO paperwork..."

              "The pre-IPO disclosures lay it out cleanly. SpaceX warns that “the continued proliferation of satellite constellations in Low-Earth Orbit, as well as the risk of collisions with space debris or other spacecraft, could limit or impair our launch flexibility and satellite deployment.”

              more...

              1/

              #SpaceX #SpaceXIPO

              frankfrank@newsie.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              frankfrank@newsie.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              frankfrank@newsie.social
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets

              Really, so there's a 'risk' Muskovite space junk will fall on our heads? No Way! Impossible!

              "Oh, look, pretty Meteorites!"

              Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • phil_stevens@mastodon.nzP phil_stevens@mastodon.nz

                @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets So the excitement will be finding out what gets vapourised faster: the Starlink constellation, or the retirement savings of millions of Americans.

                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @phil_stevens @mastodonmigration OUCH.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @grumble209 @mastodonmigration @W6KME I've thought about trying to make simulations of what the night sky would look like after Kessler syndrome really gets going, but it's just too depressing.

                  geonz@mathstodon.xyzG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • alterelefant@mastodontech.deA alterelefant@mastodontech.de

                    @mastodonmigration
                    Kessler would like to have a chat with Elmo about his syndrome.
                    @sundogplanets

                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @alterelefant @mastodonmigration Dr. Kessler is actually still publishing (at least, as of a year ago) https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/sdc9/paper/305/SDC9-paper305.pdf

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM mastodonmigration@mastodon.online

                      @sundogplanets

                      And the kicker...

                      "A worst-case scenario is flagged: a strike that could “trigger a cascading collision event that renders our licensed orbits, and potentially other orbits, unusable for an extended period."

                      SpaceX S1: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1181412/000162828026036936/spaceexplorationtechnologi.htm

                      3/

                      #SpaceX #SpaceXIPO

                      leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                      leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                      leeloo@c.im
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @mastodonmigration @sundogplanets
                      Doing things by the book. Now when launches become impossible due to Kessler Syndrome, and people try to sue them, the lawyers will just day "look, we told you about that part up front. That was the risk you gambled on".

                      Smart lawyers.

                      And investors are going to throw a ton of money at them anyway. Where as if they didn't mention this, they could be in a lot of trouble with the FTC.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        @grumble209 @mastodonmigration @W6KME I've thought about trying to make simulations of what the night sky would look like after Kessler syndrome really gets going, but it's just too depressing.

                        geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                        geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                        geonz@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @sundogplanets @grumble209 @mastodonmigration @W6KME
                        .... I hope you will do it anyway.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups