Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. New study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: A survey of 6000 CFOs, CEOS throughout US, Europe, UK and Australia comes to the conclusion that businesses predict that "AI" will improve productivity by a whopping 1.4%.

New study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: A survey of 6000 CFOs, CEOS throughout US, Europe, UK and Australia comes to the conclusion that businesses predict that "AI" will improve productivity by a whopping 1.4%.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
34 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    New study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: A survey of 6000 CFOs, CEOS throughout US, Europe, UK and Australia comes to the conclusion that businesses predict that "AI" will improve productivity by a whopping 1.4%. Truly earth shattering.

    Link Preview Image
    Firm Data on AI

    Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, and business professionals.

    favicon

    NBER (www.nber.org)

    rainer_rehak@mastodon.bits-und-baeume.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    rainer_rehak@mastodon.bits-und-baeume.orgR This user is from outside of this forum
    rainer_rehak@mastodon.bits-und-baeume.org
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @tante I guess this already small increase mostly comes from people working longer working hours now because of the bosses' high expectations when introducing "#AI" tools.

    Also see this related news: https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/09/the-first-signs-of-burnout-are-coming-from-the-people-who-embrace-ai-the-most/

    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • rainer_rehak@mastodon.bits-und-baeume.orgR rainer_rehak@mastodon.bits-und-baeume.org

      @tante I guess this already small increase mostly comes from people working longer working hours now because of the bosses' high expectations when introducing "#AI" tools.

      Also see this related news: https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/09/the-first-signs-of-burnout-are-coming-from-the-people-who-embrace-ai-the-most/

      tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
      tante@tldr.nettime.org
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @Rainer_Rehak Might be. Right now about half is just "firing people" (which then gets the rest to do what you described) and the hope for very marginal output increases.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

        @q you can check out the results and comments. What do you think the researchers did wrong? Did the CEOs lie?

        maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.social
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @tante @q this. It's a survey that asked for their opinions (partially). The CEOs and CFOs and other C-suite execs in these surveys surely have no clue what's going on in the daily life of their employees who have to actually work with all the AI stuff. The C-level guys don't even read their own email but have staff summarising them in PowerPoint's. So I'd say the data basis is very thin here...

        tante@tldr.nettime.orgT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.socialM maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.social

          @tante @q this. It's a survey that asked for their opinions (partially). The CEOs and CFOs and other C-suite execs in these surveys surely have no clue what's going on in the daily life of their employees who have to actually work with all the AI stuff. The C-level guys don't even read their own email but have staff summarising them in PowerPoint's. So I'd say the data basis is very thin here...

          tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
          tante@tldr.nettime.org
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @maxheadroom @q they do know (at least for the last years) the numbers: How much OpEx and CapEx are there in contrast to revenue. So They can pretty accurately say what happened in the past without knowing who works how

          maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

            @maxheadroom @q they do know (at least for the last years) the numbers: How much OpEx and CapEx are there in contrast to revenue. So They can pretty accurately say what happened in the past without knowing who works how

            maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            maxheadroom@hub.uckermark.social
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @tante @q I still question their capacity to relate this to AI one way or the other. Nevertheless, the low value of expected increase is still telling. Given the cost and likely increase in opex by all the users.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

              New study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: A survey of 6000 CFOs, CEOS throughout US, Europe, UK and Australia comes to the conclusion that businesses predict that "AI" will improve productivity by a whopping 1.4%. Truly earth shattering.

              Link Preview Image
              Firm Data on AI

              Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, and business professionals.

              favicon

              NBER (www.nber.org)

              namnatulco@sueden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              namnatulco@sueden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              namnatulco@sueden.social
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @tante I'm not really sure why, but the abstract calls this a sizable impact?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                New study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: A survey of 6000 CFOs, CEOS throughout US, Europe, UK and Australia comes to the conclusion that businesses predict that "AI" will improve productivity by a whopping 1.4%. Truly earth shattering.

                Link Preview Image
                Firm Data on AI

                Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, and business professionals.

                favicon

                NBER (www.nber.org)

                havvyhh2@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
                havvyhh2@mas.toH This user is from outside of this forum
                havvyhh2@mas.to
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @tante 😴💤.....at a cost of 💲💲🤑💲💲!!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ftranschel@norden.socialF ftranschel@norden.social

                  @Amorpheus @tante

                  Conspiracies aside: In a bubble market, it *is* possible to transfer wealth even if there is *none* in the long run.

                  npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                  npars01@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @ftranschel @Amorpheus @tante

                  Petrostate dictators are getting their cash out before a fossil fuel phase out.

                  Just a moment...

                  favicon

                  (www.euractiv.com)

                  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-11-06/saudis-plan-100-billion-ai-powerhouse-to-rival-uae-s-tech-hub

                  https://www.forbes.com/sites/guneyyildiz/2026/02/14/from-resorts-to-robots-saudi-arabias-100-billion-confession/

                  Like a drug cartel using banks, Silicon Valley gets a cut off the top for projects & data centers that will never be completed.

                  The goal is to launder cash as fast as possible.
                  https://airmail.news/issues/2025-4-5/the-view-from-here

                  1/

                  npars01@mstdn.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  0
                  • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                    @ftranschel @Amorpheus @tante

                    Petrostate dictators are getting their cash out before a fossil fuel phase out.

                    Just a moment...

                    favicon

                    (www.euractiv.com)

                    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-11-06/saudis-plan-100-billion-ai-powerhouse-to-rival-uae-s-tech-hub

                    https://www.forbes.com/sites/guneyyildiz/2026/02/14/from-resorts-to-robots-saudi-arabias-100-billion-confession/

                    Like a drug cartel using banks, Silicon Valley gets a cut off the top for projects & data centers that will never be completed.

                    The goal is to launder cash as fast as possible.
                    https://airmail.news/issues/2025-4-5/the-view-from-here

                    1/

                    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    npars01@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    2/

                    Balkan & Italian mafiosos used movies & casinos to launder cash.

                    Russian & Hong Kong oligarchs used the real estate markets to launder their looting.

                    Saudi Arabia is using AI & tech startups.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Money laundering plays a key role in every part of the illegal drugs industry – here’s how it works

                    To curb the illicit drugs trade, law enforcement should look beyond individual drug busts and focus on capturing the illegal money that reaches so many parts of the global economy.

                    favicon

                    The Conversation (theconversation.com)

                    Just a moment...

                    favicon

                    (marker.medium.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    ‘It’s a complete black box’: Russian oligarchs pour money into U.S. real estate market

                    As President Joe Biden vows to punish Russia with financial sanctions by seizing yachts, mansions and other assets, members of the real estate community and

                    favicon

                    NBC News (www.nbcnews.com)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      New study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: A survey of 6000 CFOs, CEOS throughout US, Europe, UK and Australia comes to the conclusion that businesses predict that "AI" will improve productivity by a whopping 1.4%. Truly earth shattering.

                      Link Preview Image
                      Firm Data on AI

                      Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, and business professionals.

                      favicon

                      NBER (www.nber.org)

                      dch@bsd.networkD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dch@bsd.networkD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dch@bsd.network
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      @tante I‘d like to see the same study but outlining the CO2 and wider environmental footprint from it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                        Oh and most companies report no productivity gains in the last 3 years but that cannot surprise anyone by now.

                        killick@dmv.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                        killick@dmv.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                        killick@dmv.community
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @tante
                        https://fortune.com/2026/02/17/ai-productivity-paradox-ceo-study-robert-solow-information-technology-age/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • maker@woods.secretbearsociety.orgM maker@woods.secretbearsociety.org

                          @tante I remember all those headache inducing non sense conversations with directors, C-something dudes, managers when trying to define "software productivity". No one could agree and, despite all good sense and examples, they mostly stuck to the good old "productivity is how many lines of code are written and software is pushed to prod".

                          None of this includes meaningful software, quality code, user impact, etc. so yes spaghetti code generators will improve a certain definition of productivity

                          killick@dmv.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                          killick@dmv.communityK This user is from outside of this forum
                          killick@dmv.community
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @Maker @tante

                          You get more of what you measure. MBAs love their metrics, regardless of results.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups