Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
86 Posts 55 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

    Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

    Link Preview Image
    Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

    Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

    favicon

    TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

    A short thread
    🧵>>

    setok@attractive.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
    setok@attractive.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
    setok@attractive.space
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    @emilymbender yeah, even for someone who is pro-tech and interested in AI developments, this @TechCrunch piece read like a press release. It was journalistically extremely weak to the point I felt dumber for reading it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

      Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

      Link Preview Image
      Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

      Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

      favicon

      TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

      A short thread
      🧵>>

      eurospoofer@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      eurospoofer@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      eurospoofer@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      @emilymbender 2.5 billion users a month they claim.
      Having an AI summary forced into every search doesn't make the searcher a user of the tech. How many people simply ignore the summary?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

        Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

        Link Preview Image
        Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

        Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

        favicon

        TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

        A short thread
        🧵>>

        gerhardd@olching.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gerhardd@olching.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        gerhardd@olching.social
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        @emilymbender The good news: nobody needs #google. I've blocked all their MTAs, and resisted using their apps for quite some time. No problems so far.

        6@possum.city6 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

          Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

          Link Preview Image
          Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

          Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

          favicon

          TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

          A short thread
          🧵>>

          cockburn@mastodon.moule.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
          cockburn@mastodon.moule.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
          cockburn@mastodon.moule.world
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          @emilymbender google is so unreliable now, it's time for them to lose their worldwide use of "google" as a verb.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

            NO NO NO NO NO! Flashy polished looking webpages that no one has accountability for run absolutely counter to the common good when it comes to a health information ecosystem AND an informed public.

            (Also, "Antigravity"? Yeah, you want us to think this is very cool science fiction and/or magic. Not buying it.)

            >>

            sharksonaplane@mastodon.sandwich.netS This user is from outside of this forum
            sharksonaplane@mastodon.sandwich.netS This user is from outside of this forum
            sharksonaplane@mastodon.sandwich.net
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            @emilymbender Exactly!

            I understand that business value propositions change over time, but going from "we disrupted search by making a simple interface" to "we ruptured search by making our simple interface complicated (and terrible)" is. well, it's certainly. a choice.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

              How infantilizing --- you thought you were looking to find something that someone else wrote on the web. But woah! Now you've been "dropped into" an "interactive experience". Yeah, Google can just fuck right off with that.

              >>

              turre@mementomori.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              turre@mementomori.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              turre@mementomori.social
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              @emilymbender
              Yeah, if somebody is still using Google Search, now is the time to get off it. There are other search engines out there.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                Link Preview Image
                Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                favicon

                TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                A short thread
                🧵>>

                roadskater@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                roadskater@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                roadskater@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                @emilymbender I saw someone toot about that Tuesday afternoon, and my reaction to the article was, "So TechCrunch is rewriting Google press releases?" Not a critical thought expressed in the article. IIRC, no quotes from anyone at all, positive or negative. Just a list of supposedly useful features and enhancements.

                Feh.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S shadsterling@mastodon.social

                  @romli @hamishb @emilymbender for the AI overview that precedes any actual search results, that link doesn’t describe a persistent opt-out, only a per-search bypass with “ -ai”. Which is a start

                  tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tomtom@pouet.chapril.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
                  tomtom@pouet.chapril.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  @ShadSterling @romli @hamishb @emilymbender use duckduckgo and you have simple ai opt out .

                  But anyway all this suppose there will be something left to search for on the web. Nowadays most often than not the first 10 links returned are AI generated web site slop.
                  Given that this slop is now used to generate further down the drain AI sites, the untrustworthy garbage'll soon supersede 100-1 trustworthy sources.

                  Maybe we'll have to come back to human indexed content of a curated list of sites.

                  morqendi@mstdn.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                    Here is where it really starts to show that this journalist is just lightly paraphrasing a press release. "Links will become an afterthought," will they? What is your evidence for that confident statement about the future?

                    >>

                    Link Preview Image
                    nitrml@tyrol.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nitrml@tyrol.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nitrml@tyrol.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @emilymbender alternatively the intended meaning could be "links become an afterthought for Google, because Google doesn't think about links anymore"?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                      For one final shudder: Pichai here seems to want to think this is helping the world somehow? Gah.

                      >>

                      Link Preview Image
                      guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                      guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                      guillotine_jones@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @emilymbender
                      More rubbish from Google's Pichai.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                        Here is where it really starts to show that this journalist is just lightly paraphrasing a press release. "Links will become an afterthought," will they? What is your evidence for that confident statement about the future?

                        >>

                        Link Preview Image
                        tiikerikani@dice.campT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tiikerikani@dice.campT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tiikerikani@dice.camp
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @emilymbender And here is that press release... https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/search-io-2026/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                          Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                          Link Preview Image
                          Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                          Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                          favicon

                          TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                          A short thread
                          🧵>>

                          allancavanagh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          allancavanagh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          allancavanagh@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @emilymbender so… search is now Google Wave but with robots.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gerhardd@olching.socialG gerhardd@olching.social

                            @emilymbender The good news: nobody needs #google. I've blocked all their MTAs, and resisted using their apps for quite some time. No problems so far.

                            6@possum.city6 This user is from outside of this forum
                            6@possum.city6 This user is from outside of this forum
                            6@possum.city
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            @emilymbender@dair-community.social @GerhardD@olching.social eh, gmail is still biiig, i wouldn't outright block it (but it would be fair to send straight to spam lol)
                            most of the stuff's unneeded tho ye
                            there's very little that's actually needed, it's just the Default Effect + ecosystem effect

                            some people do need it tho, much like some people need microslop's stuff
                            usually when they're already invested, and used to things, it would be
                            possible to migrate away but that would take a whole lot of effort for only moral gain

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S shadsterling@mastodon.social

                              @romli @hamishb @emilymbender for the AI overview that precedes any actual search results, that link doesn’t describe a persistent opt-out, only a per-search bypass with “ -ai”. Which is a start

                              miclgael@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              miclgael@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              miclgael@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @ShadSterling @romli @hamishb @emilymbender

                              Link Preview Image
                              No Shit Sherlock – Get this Extension for 🦊 Firefox (en-US)

                              Download No Shit Sherlock for Firefox. Filter out AI slop and social media spam from YouTube and DuckDuckGo search results

                              favicon

                              (addons.mozilla.org)

                              Would love to know if this works for you!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                For one final shudder: Pichai here seems to want to think this is helping the world somehow? Gah.

                                >>

                                Link Preview Image
                                airwhale@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                airwhale@beige.partyA This user is from outside of this forum
                                airwhale@beige.party
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                @emilymbender

                                It sounds better than the truth. This helps Google, the ad-company, to better shape the “experience” as it best suits their paying ad-customers.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                  Not satisfied to cut people off from the important sense-making of looking at information in its context and finding and navigating different perspectives (what "AI overviews" do), Google also wants to tell you what to search for:

                                  >>

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  androcat@toot.cat
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47

                                  @emilymbender
                                  "rather than making you decide" is such a fancy way of saying "we've removed your choice".

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • nicoe@mamot.frN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nicoe@mamot.frN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nicoe@mamot.fr
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48

                                    @Qybat @emilymbender if no one sees the ads, the companies will stop buying adspace. That's not what google wants. So I guess they will embed the ads in the search results.

                                    And the web will have finally evolved to be just like television. Just a bit more interactive because you'll be allowed to purchase directly what you see on screen (but probably nothing else).

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                      More stenography here. Google starting shoving the "AI Overviews" into query results as an opt-out situation. That is, you have to take action to have them not pop up. I don't doubt they are *shown to* 2.5 billion monthly users, but that doesn't mean they are used by as many or desired by them.

                                      >>

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      energisch_@troet.cafeE This user is from outside of this forum
                                      energisch_@troet.cafe
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @emilymbender this is enshittification of the next level to turn us into brainless puppets on their strings

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                        Wow some terrible reporting about Google's latest horrible ideas about how to distort information access in the name of "convenience" (or something):

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Google Search as you know it is over | TechCrunch

                                        Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.

                                        favicon

                                        TechCrunch (techcrunch.com)

                                        A short thread
                                        🧵>>

                                        scottgal@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        scottgal@hachyderm.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        scottgal@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #50

                                        @emilymbender Is this an article of press release? Either way it's AWFUL.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • emilymbender@dair-community.socialE emilymbender@dair-community.social

                                          How infantilizing --- you thought you were looking to find something that someone else wrote on the web. But woah! Now you've been "dropped into" an "interactive experience". Yeah, Google can just fuck right off with that.

                                          >>

                                          yala@degrowth.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                          yala@degrowth.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                          yala@degrowth.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #51

                                          @emilymbender

                                          @energisch_

                                          I stopped reading after "Google Search will drop users".

                                          energisch_@troet.cafeE 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups