https://archipelago.1sland.social/fires
-
@julian You'll definitely want a FederationPolicies model, beyond just a "block these domains" list.
For instance, coming in the future to FIRES is a way to distribute Hashtags that may contain harmful content, such that you could choose to filter those out.
Or, maybe you want to filter those in (I see you NodeBB and how you get content federated in!)
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io hashtag filtering would be handy. I'm interested in seeing how that will shape up. Apologies for missing the T&S call yesterday.
I noted in my third-party blocklist implementation that IFTAS DNI and AUD lists classify entries as
silenceorsuspend. I am assuming that these are expanded in FIRES with a couple additional items?I may be mis-remembering from our talk a couple months back <img class="not-responsive emoji" src="https://activitypub.space/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=a2a7da0aec4" title="
" /> -
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io hashtag filtering would be handy. I'm interested in seeing how that will shape up. Apologies for missing the T&S call yesterday.
I noted in my third-party blocklist implementation that IFTAS DNI and AUD lists classify entries as
silenceorsuspend. I am assuming that these are expanded in FIRES with a couple additional items?I may be mis-remembering from our talk a couple months back <img class="not-responsive emoji" src="https://activitypub.space/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f604.png?v=a2a7da0aec4" title="
" />@julian yeah, we don't currently support a "silence" because no one really knows what that means so we're pushing towards more granular filters
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
@julian yeah, we don't currently support a "silence" because no one really knows what that means so we're pushing towards more granular filters
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io have you settled on a list I can code against? iirc we had discussed
suspend,filter, andallow. Not sure if the terms have changed since. -
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io have you settled on a list I can code against? iirc we had discussed
suspend,filter, andallow. Not sure if the terms have changed since.@julian waiting for implementations to give me feedback
-
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io have you settled on a list I can code against? iirc we had discussed
suspend,filter, andallow. Not sure if the terms have changed since.@julian we have four policies: Accept, Filter, Reject, Drop
We have N filters: https://fires.fedimod.org/concepts/filters.html
-
@julian waiting for implementations to give me feedback
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io any specific place you want feedback (officially)?
I have no desire for anything more than those 3.
-
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io any specific place you want feedback (officially)?
I have no desire for anything more than those 3.
@julian so suspend is either reject or drop as a recommendation; reject says you should tell the sending server "I reject this activity", drop is "I acknowledge this activity" but you quietly send it to /dev/null
-
@julian so suspend is either reject or drop as a recommendation; reject says you should tell the sending server "I reject this activity", drop is "I acknowledge this activity" but you quietly send it to /dev/null
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io great, I'm good to implement those. I'll have to take a closer look at the FIRES documentation next week

-
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io great, I'm good to implement those. I'll have to take a closer look at the FIRES documentation next week

@julian I was informed of one gap in the documentation but the API is very follow your nose
-
@julian I was informed of one gap in the documentation but the API is very follow your nose
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io hah okay, I'll take notes on omissions I find as well.
-
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io hah okay, I'll take notes on omissions I find as well.
@julian writing all the docs takes a huge amount of time

I also don't think I've structured them right yet