@dymaxion @macronencer I mean, all technology is held together by duct tape, yeah. Such is the nature of squeezing margin out of capital. That doesn't mean deploying a hecto-mesh of satellites is the approach to go with for resilient remote miltary operations. I mean, think about it this way: did Iran need Starlink to strike Dubai with drones?
W
wallabra@bark.lgbt
@wallabra@bark.lgbt
Posts
-
Don't worry, Sam, SpaceX won't ACTUALLY launch 7,000 satellites! -
❝ AI is more expensive than paying human workers ❞@blogdiva "sentient organic bipedal operational input resources"
-
Don't worry, Sam, SpaceX won't ACTUALLY launch 7,000 satellites!@macronencer Ohh, right, yeah, that argument. I had forgotten about it.
Yeah, it's bollocks. Ukraine still has Internet infrastructure. It's not as hard to destroy internet connectivity in a war precisely because of the distributive nature of routable networks.
In other words, Starlink is completely unnecessary. Ukraine's gonna be fine... at least internet wise.
-
Don't worry, Sam, SpaceX won't ACTUALLY launch 7,000 satellites!@macronencer @sundogplanets Wait, what's the image for?