U
@neilmadden I hear what you‘re saying.
Just one more thing 
I think the reason why they call it „dangerous“ is that is has gotten much better at developing working exploits than previous models.
Sorry same source 
https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/
@neilmadden I‘m likely misunderstanding what you‘re saying (so keep that in mind ).
My question is: even if it‘s not verifiable directly. Isn‘t the trajectory pretty clear? I think there are a lot of samples out there of publicly released LLM finding and exploiting vulnerabilities. And the development is moving at a fast pace.
(But I too am happy when journalists actually question things)
@hrw I wonder why the company is called ASPEED, can‘t be because of the speed of the AST2500
