CIRCLE WITH A DOT

27th march

ALGORAVE at the V&A
(details coming soon)

25th march

GENRE[FATIGUE]
https://ra.co/events/2359575

11th march

ALGORAVIOLI
https://luma.com/w5c689no

5th march

C3S: MAKE SOME NOISE
https://luma.com/irk1t53y

4th march

ALGORHYTHMS
https://luma.com/1db23uki

27th february

FEELING OF COMPUTING
https://luma.com/uelsztjx

25th february

GENRE[FATIGUE]
https://ra.co/events/2359467

LONDON?
23rd february

LIVE CODING MEETUP
https://luma.com/zsdyg3hg

@yaxu strongly disagree! there are huge incentives for designers and product people to get involved with volunteering, just like programmers.

and yes accessibility is a huge factor of this. getting design and product-oriented people involved means software becomes accessible to more people

@inscript you should meet some designers!

@inscript the facetious division I'm making is in resistance to the status quo arrogance / view that diminishes creative design and product work while boosting the importance of programming. I'm challenging that narrative by inverting it. that imagined inverted world sounds surprisingly not-so-bad, which calls into question our current priorities

@inscript
- programmers designing things is a *negative* side effect.
- from my experience, "scrappy" is also rare in the design world.

we gave the tech nerds too much power

"[just] use IRC"
"[just] use a forum"
"[just] self-host by shushing into your prill scropt. it's easy you [just] prantiss a few cuntwobs. what's the big deal? there's no excuse. [just] spin up a brosh instance."

@inscript designers are not vernacular programmers. programmers are vernacular designers.

these toots were inspired by checking out a load of discord "alternatives"

writing code should not be the primary way of contributing to free open source software

free open source software needs fewer engineers and more designers and product people