Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT

thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

@thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems
About
Posts
9
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Deprecating Linux support for #gentoo: https://www.gentoo.org/news/2026/04/01/gentoo-hurd.html
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    Deprecating Linux support for #gentoo: https://www.gentoo.org/news/2026/04/01/gentoo-hurd.html

    Uncategorized gentoo

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @ariadne @lanodan @bluca yeah, and even before fuzzers with any sort of security tooling actually ("hello your CSP policy is missing on ur static website")

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @lanodan @bluca @ariadne Yes, exactly, it really is fuzzers all over again, just the problem is you now have this script-kiddy enabling tech on top.

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @ariadne @bluca @lanodan I've sort of come to this position as well, especially sympathising w/ what Lennart says about Bad Guys already using LLMs to find vulnerabilities, so may as well try to leverage them to do some good.

    Don't love it still but I definitely feel warmer to it than the rest.

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @bluca @lanodan @ariadne If a contributor had copilot review their PR for systemd but systemd didn't have it as part of CI or as some regular part of contribution, I'd say the same thing.

    But I'm not even making rules! I'm pointing out a distinction?

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @bluca @lanodan @ariadne Someone deciding to send ML output a handful of times an ML is different from it being an established part of the project, sure.

    (I also didn't say "perfectly ok", it's just that it's clearly different, even if one does or doesn't like it?)

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @bluca @astraleureka @lanodan @ariadne I don't think their work was used at all. But I'm not arguing everyone should switch to Hurd, I'm just saying I don't think it's tainted, and I think some random person (same person each time) sending LLM content a handful of times to an ML isn't the same thing?

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @astraleureka @lanodan @ariadne No, it was a lot of work by a handful of people over many years. It has nothing to do with LLMs.

    Uncategorized

  • I saw a wild take where someone said distributions are fascist for using systemd because systemd now uses Claude for code review.
    thesamesam@social.treehouse.systemsT thesamesam@social.treehouse.systems

    @lanodan @ariadne re Hurd: I only saw one person doing some LLM review (not of submitted patches but they took it upon themselves to submit its findings), I don't consider that tainted and I don't think it's some sort of official effort or anything, even if I don't like it.

    systemd embracing it with a CLAUDE.md, using it in all PRs, commits co-authored-by it etc is different.

    Uncategorized
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups