That last one is a funny statement because it's laughably easy for a human to maintain the execution of a function after a style refactor. You would reprimand a junior if they couldn't do that
snowyfox@deadinsi.de
Posts
-
i'm at a loss of words after reading a paper about reformatting code using an ML model that has a measured statistical quantity A_c which says how often the reformatted code behaves the same as the original -
i'm at a loss of words after reading a paper about reformatting code using an ML model that has a measured statistical quantity A_c which says how often the reformatted code behaves the same as the originalFigure in question seems to be about "model performing in its ideal conditions"
The author's actual opinion is implied in the Results:
"After inspecting the compilation checking module, we found that DUET CS achieves 55.8% computational accuracy, which is a practical metric for a code generation system. This result shows that more than half of the output code are compilable and implement the same function as the input code. The user can
use this check as an optional layer of the pipeline to guarantee grammar correctness.
...
We found that even the non-compilable outputs display around 60% similarity to the ground truth, which means even if DUET CS cannot always produce grammar-correct code, it can still provide valuable information to help user to transfer code style.
...
Notice, that generally the task of generating the exact same code as ground truth is very hard, especially when the code length is rather long (˜47 lines)." -
Did you know?Did you know? Historical societies did not think of themselves as being in some quaint fantasy. Everything in their world is just the world to them, with all developments as modern. e.g. They felt the same about new wars as we do
RE: https://xyzzy.link/objects/fd9a400d-520a-440e-8d4c-65bac02fc660
-
Always make sure your bed is ready to sleep firstAlways make sure your bed is ready to sleep first
-
Anecdotally, meowAnecdotally, meow