@neil I have read it, though not in as much detail as I did in the For Women case. I do think the regulations are problematic (and should only exist to protect consumers from deception, not to protect the farming lobby) but I find the Oatly arguments more persuasive than the Dairy UK ones.
P
pwaring@social.xk7.net
@pwaring@social.xk7.net
Posts
-
This Supreme Court ruling on the use of 'milk' by milk alternatives (e.g. plant milk) seems a bit odd, I don't think anyone buying oat milk thinks it is dairy milk. -
This Supreme Court ruling on the use of 'milk' by milk alternatives (e.g. plant milk) seems a bit odd, I don't think anyone buying oat milk thinks it is dairy milk.This Supreme Court ruling on the use of 'milk' by milk alternatives (e.g. plant milk) seems a bit odd, I don't think anyone buying oat milk thinks it is dairy milk.
Will the makers of I Can't Believe It's Not Butter have their trademark challenged as a result?
Oatly banned from using word ‘milk’ to market plant-based products in UK
Swedish company claims ruling is anti-competitive and ‘solely benefits Big Dairy’
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
