CIRCLE WITH A DOT

windows doesn't have malware because it's not profitable to target windows users in 2026

linux doesn't have malware if you don't count seventeen malicious npm packages per second as malware

i actually have opinions on flatbread now

TIL that the whole point of requiring attribution in permissive licenses is not to give the author bragging rights, but to make sure that the "no warranty whatsoever" part of the license is preserved and clearly visible to the end user

Germany doesn't have "copyright". We have "Urheberrecht" (literally translated "Originator's Right" or "Creator's Right", but usually translated as "Author's Right").

there's no word "moon" in japanese. instead, japanese people say "tsuki", which translates to "moon", and i think that's beautiful

@Li honestly just slap unlicense into the root of your project and don't worry about it too much

@MiaWinter @natty i think people thanklessly developing vital internet infrastructure should just embrace the burnout and despair like the rest of us

no wait actually copyleft licenses are also unethical because they motivate ai slop license laundering

yellow is a color, but yellouw is a colour

risk-aware consensual c programming

@ijomeli true!

a friendly reminder:

proprietary software is unethical because it restricts user freedom and evil corporations love that shit

open source is unethical because you're just giving more training data to evil corporations

permissive licenses are unethical because you're allowing evil corporations to use your work

copyleft licenses are unethical because a starving transfem game developer won't be able to use your code in her next game that she really needs to sell because otherwise an evil corporation will evict her from her apartment