P
@dansup we do not disagree on that point!
I never voted for bringing the text to pixelfed! but there are beautiful gallery posts out there and I think they belong to a photoverse platform.
this this was by no means meant to make pixelfed a "jack-of-all-trades" content wise!
I agree that simply allowing `Article` might be a very short-sighted solution, but I would love to find a solution that allows photo posts to show up on pixelfed, egardless if the type is `Article` or `Note`!
@dansup I am not sure why this escalated so quickly and we are now at a point where blocking long-form content is on the table!?
I simply wanted to start a discussion about it 
@dansup but that is a totally different discussion I think. switching to not on the WordPress site and I am able to publish images.
The `Note` object type is no indicator for "it is truly an image post" nor is `Article` an indicator of "the post has only a header image".
let's bring #longform (text) support to the #photoverse
(this is not (mainly) about long texts on #pixelfed or #vernissage (they can both fall back to show the summary), it is about supporting image posts with the object type: `Article`)
* https://github.com/VernissageApp/VernissageServer/pull/442
* https://github.com/pixelfed/pixelfed/pull/6458
