Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

pascal_costanza@functional.cafeP

pascal_costanza@functional.cafe

@pascal_costanza@functional.cafe
About
Posts
1
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • I have now seen this a few times in mailing lists: There is some discussion with an explicit or implicit question, somebody asks some random LLM and then posts its answer into the discussion, without double-checking it.
    pascal_costanza@functional.cafeP pascal_costanza@functional.cafe

    I have now seen this a few times in mailing lists: There is some discussion with an explicit or implicit question, somebody asks some random LLM and then posts its answer into the discussion, without double-checking it. Then somebody else double-checks it, shows that it's wrong, or at least in need of some correction. All of this is a waste of bandwidth, and frankly speaking just impolite. No matter what your stance on LLMs is, anybody can ask an LLMs themselves, there is no added value whatsoever in posting an unfiltered LLM answer to a public discussion. There should be an etiquette on banning this kind of behavior. I assume that people who do this act in good faith and believe that they are helpful, so it's ok to tell them in a gentle way, but this behavior should stop IMHO.

    Uncategorized
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups