@lcamtuf personally I think humans have a critical vulnerability in the interaction of being handed a completely plausible thought, whether encoded as speech/electrical signals/vision that once holding it will invent reasons why it is correct. That or we are just lazy haven't decided
O
owoday@social.seattle.wa.us
@owoday@social.seattle.wa.us
Posts
-
At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed. -
At this point, LLM-written think pieces make up about half of all long-form writing in my social media feed.@lcamtuf honestly it reminds me of this study https://people.psych.ucsb.edu/gazzaniga/PDF/Language%20after%20section%20of%20the%20cerebral%20commissueres%20(1967).pdf
They seperate the sides of the brain and try to communicate with them individually.
> when an object was placed in the left hand (right hemisphere sensing it), the speaking left hemisphere fabricated a verbal explanation for why the patient was holding it
Later studies (60s so could be horseshit) worked with a theory of one side being more of an interpreter.