Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

nahratzah@mstdn.socialN

nahratzah@mstdn.social

@nahratzah@mstdn.social
About
Posts
2
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • I just boosted a question, but I have a slightly reworded question.
    nahratzah@mstdn.socialN nahratzah@mstdn.social

    @krahabors @WeirdWriter No idea.

    But systemd is used by many linuxen.
    And even server OSes have users, and can be used on your laptop (or a VM image).

    Depending on how the law is worded, these may or may not be in scope.

    But for this question, I recommend you speak to a (qualified) sollicitor, which I am not. ❤

    Uncategorized linux foss

  • I just boosted a question, but I have a slightly reworded question.
    nahratzah@mstdn.socialN nahratzah@mstdn.social

    @WeirdWriter I don't know. I hear systemd has a patch. Which wouldn't surprise me, because redhat (a company) probably wants to keep selling their OS to big tech companies in California.

    But I've also seen a debian post on this, that tries to bring this to its logical conclusion.
    https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2026/03/msg00018.html
    Which can be used as a basis for arguing this is a bad law.

    Uncategorized linux foss
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups