CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@mormund @HennaVirkkunen @emilymbender @n_dimension
I did not look at the link (yet), but with your particular claims I could agree with. Especially with its "very very harmful" part.

Like example of manipulation by AI bots and big tech (they collect vasts amout of most initimate data (personal psychology), and plans to show advertisements to people, hopefully not political manipulation yet).

In general, if someone is trying to convice decision maker like EC vice president, claims have to be more solid and based in fact, rather than which differs with reality like pretending AI did not vastly improved in (close to) all areas during last decade.

I will skip listing those capabilities to not scare too much, but if not afraid, then suggest looking up latest chinese humanoids (which combine wide array of superb AI capabilities into one machine), some robots have such amazing capabilities beyond what anyone imagined possible.

So, dear EC vice president, I am scared of these machines, so please don't deploy them in Europe, because it can get out of control if being not careful.

@joykill AI advancing a ton all the time, I don't get what do you (and others) try to do with such super weird comments about no advancement? ‍️

Certainly were was amazing advancement, and its very bad. Too much dangerous advancement too fast.

Fediversians are so AI sceptical, yet I seen fediverse poll, where great majority of people on the network have not used this tech to begin with, yet talk about education of others.

As we vastly disagree on basic stuff, I won't argue much, but just wanted to express my wonder and opinion that denial is weird and aren't helpful to solve AI problem. Maybe consider subscribing to @n_dimension who is also critical on AI denial like me, but unlike me, I seen he does not mind arguing, and also is AI expert seems to me writing on it often.

@HennaVirkkunen