CIRCLE WITH A DOT

I asked #Google #Stitch for screens for simple application based on my spreadsheet's screenshot... 20 minutes of processing ended up with unexpected error and inability to finish the task.

#Prompt had three lines.

Right. Am I #LLMs #killer?

@fasterthanlime Just stuff I remember now, there was more:

2. lack of declaration distinction between dyn safe and dyn non-safe traits, so compiler cannot restrict us before use

@fasterthanlime Just stuff I remember now, there was more:

1. `Arc<>::clone()` gives me goosebumps

@hbons In some countries cities have flags. #Poland for example.

@soph But the same interpretation would apply to proprietary code generated using LLMs trained on whatever. If the copyright protection cannot be granted in result of lack of novum IP, that's violation of any license granted to customers in exchange for money. Am I wrong?

If someone would train the model from scratch on own code and materials they have license for (in this case not open-source), that would be their unique tool in their private bag that couldn't be rejected from protection.

@soph Assuming that's understood. Can we, the humans, draw boundary between violating and meeting the novum IP rules? What use of LLMs as tools would let us pass the test?

@AAKL @TheNewStack Fallacy. That's number from 7,156 participants of survey, participants who know what #Rust is.

Conservative estimates start ant 20.8 MILLION of professional developers. You can't do any statistically significant estimate from a 0.3‰ sample.

@tomekw Not all of them require, many factors at play.

But #Rust to guarantee safety brings abstractions to a very high level, in result, to allow flexibility in getting things implemented fast it needs a lot of (proven) features. Some may argue these may be ceded to libraries (crates), but then we have a scrutiny issue of our supply chain.

@troy @satobi I'm in agreement with you on that.