L
@dlakelan I will follow along.
If you find more people and need infrastructure for measuring volunteer effort, I can bring back mine.
It is blockchain-based (my own WASM engine), I have identity integration (even OAuth2 backed in the blockchain infra).
My tech has never been used for "crypto" coins, and the idea was that nobody could trade volunteer points and medals for external assets. And that points are given for a documented action, verified by peers.
@dlakelan to be clear: I had hundreds of interviews with interested people and 100-200 selected people onboarded into our Discord. I personally helped most of them( from explaining how to use our tech, to explaining to them how to use GitHub). Everyone wanted to receive services. Nobody came to give something (other than the 2 of us who started this).
So the major issue you will face is finding people who want to give and protecting the community from those who only want to take.
@dlakelan I've spent years of my life trying to build software for this type of idea. Quantifying actual effort. I called it "The Laurel Project" and we were 2 volunteers working on it full-time. I made a mistake to use "volunteering" and "volunteer" to explain that we want a community of people who work from their heart. Instead, I spent 3 months onboarding people who just wanted to put an experience on their college application, so our collaboration would end in a couple of days.
I have the tech that can guarantee a 1-hour referendum for a small country.
With cryptographic proof of inclusion for any vote. So any citizen can verify their own vote.
What will happen if I release this publicly?
@JohnKiriakou @ivycyber, why do you focus on privacy instead of focusing on the provability of everything the government does?
Even if their actions are secret, they must have a publicly verifiable ledger, so when their actions are made public, everybody can verify the evidence.
The tech exists for the notarization of millions of actions per second.
