Welcome, I'm glad you're here.
I know you'll find community in the fediverse!
For p2p maybe you'll like to meet @p2panda ? Or is https://sciop.net/ interesting to you, which was built by fedizens! 

Welcome, I'm glad you're here.
I know you'll find community in the fediverse!
For p2p maybe you'll like to meet @p2panda ? Or is https://sciop.net/ interesting to you, which was built by fedizens! 

GrapheneOS has consistently, for 10+ years, worked in the best interest of users with extraodinarily high development standards.
At the difficult decision points I'm aware of as an end user, each time the project remained true to developing an impeccable secure & private mobile OS.
This is the remarkable story that should be reported about GrapheneOS.
I haven't yet read the Wired article.
Darknet J? I vaguely remember him from the IRC chats.
He's primarily responsible for continuing on the name of CopperheadOS?
Why would Wired give his accounting credence when Copperhead immediately fell into irrelevance once Stinger moved on.
Did Wired not reference court documents to corroborate and discern facts?
The alternative status quo I dream about 
Join our matrix/rocket chat/nextcloud talk space by filling out our heyform interest form. Check out our mobilizon/lauti community shared calendar to find events. Our static website and wiki is here...
οΈ All of these non extractive/exploitive tools are managed by our local tech co-op for XX/mo. They contribute a percentage of that back to upstream developers.