CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@inthehands@hachyderm.io He earned the ire of America's most corrupt fascist by trying to bring justice, and for that he earned my respect.

@jwz@mastodon.social There's a million jokes to be said here about his teleportation adventure to waffle house, but the fact that a top official for a disaster relief org genuinely believes this is sad and scary at the same time.

@Wrewdison@masto.hackers.town Don't think for a moment that you shouldn't post positivity or lighthearted stuff. There's something to be said of the kind of people who seek to spread joy in terrible times. Keep on keepin' on!

@lu_leipzig@troet.cafe and its banned now. Lmao. + respect to codeberg for that

A quick look at the TOS shows a few relevant things;

I did notice that there doesn't seem to be any language that explicitly bars the use of AI "agents" such as above, but, there is some lines that deal with copyright. I.E.
"(4) Content that is deemed illegal in Germany (e.g. by violating copyright or privacy laws) will be taken offline and may lead to immediate account suspension." And another similar copyright passage. As AI is often trained on copyrighted works without regard for ownership, it will often also 'generate' copyright infringing material.

I also took a look at the profile for "Andy" and noticed that it has generated 6 repositories, and all except 1 are empty save for a readme.md which just says a few things about what it "intends" to do in the repos. The one repo that isn't empty is essentially just the web page html in the above screenshot.

Lastly (and least noteworthy)
Is that in Codeberg's TOS they have a provision against accounts that may harm Codeberg's reputation. That could be used as a justification in itself to simply remove the bot.

Can't wait for the next headline:
"DOJ investigated themselves and concluded they did nothing wrong"