Unfortunately, this proposal would require a breaking change. Therefore, I've decided to retract it.
J
jub0bs@infosec.exchange
@jub0bs@infosec.exchange
Posts
-
I've just filed a proposal to make bool an ordered type (compatible with operators <, <=, >, and >=) in #golang: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/78027 -
Fewer bounds checks in #golang thanks to Youlin Feng: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/719881Fewer bounds checks in #golang thanks to Youlin Feng: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/719881
-
I've just filed a proposal to make bool an ordered type (compatible with operators <, <=, >, and >=) in #golang: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/78027I've just filed a proposal to make bool an ordered type (compatible with operators <, <=, >, and >=) in #golang: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/78027