CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@xgranade I _kind of_ like the Diet Electron approach of something like Dioxus, but with Dioxus I think the AI slop exposure risk factor is super-high, making the nominative similarity to “dioxin” bitterly apt.

@xgranade Apple ʜᴀꜱ built a platform⸺one can build complex functionality on top of SwiftUI for a really low net cost in RAM usage (because SwiftUI is all shared code). It’s just not a cross-platform platform. That’s not their problem, though.

@froztbyte @glyph maybe “AI mediated cognitive change”, subtypes “AI mediated cognitive enhancement”, “AI mediated cognitive decline”, and “AI mediated cognitive distortion”?

@manon @CoolerPseudonym Is that the DEATHMØLE logo? I guess part of the point is that it’s difficult to tell.

@0xabad1dea The Orson Welles of hounds.

@xgranade @glyph I feel like this works the first time only (and hey, Split/Split saves you the cost of the postage), but after that the metagame has changed.

The first time, the calculus is different. It includes “do I trust this obviously clever person who has really put thought into it to follow through on their super clever metagame-breaking play, or not?”