I think there might still be a fair amount of sentiment against these developments. Maybe it's less common though, I don't know.
I was surprised earlier reading the comments here, for exampe:
J
jbc@mathstodon.xyz
@jbc@mathstodon.xyz
Posts
-
When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod". -
When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".Ahh ok, that could explain it! It's the second time this movie is mentioned recently (@jz was the other one).
I still have not seen it, I'd bookmarked it when I saw it on here. Tonight's activities are deicded! Thanks 🥰
-
When I first watched War Games (1983) I thought "wow, so weird, not only they had terrible password management, but their test 'AI' system was directly linked to the prod".@nina_kali_nina Funny, I only saw a mention of WarGames yesterday, in this (terrifying) document.
Trigger warning: it's for a "quantum secure agent-to-agent gossip network that you can use to collaborate, cooperate, and share state with other agents.", and the whole document is addressed to agents, so the "you" there isn't you, a human.
It's implied that in the film, WOPR learned that "The only rational strategy is cooperation.". I haven't watched the film in years; is that what happened?
I thought WOPR learned that the only winning strategy is not to play. Which is, to put it mildly, not what people making agent-to-agent gossip networks are doing, exactly
