CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@hiphopheaven You don't protest of the Israeli hostages you never step foot in Palestine and were murdered by Palestine militias. These were unarmed man, women and children, but you want me to protest for Palestine dead unarmed man, women and children ?

@hiphopheaven Did you protest against the dead Israeli hostages?

@hiphopheaven And the dead hostages ? Write them on the snow ?

@hiphopheaven Until Hezbollah do not stop with the terrorist actions, cant do anything. I'm pacifist, can't support barbaric actions. As far as I'm concern, Israelis now answer to a barbaric actions against their people. Would you defend your people if they were attacked ?

@hiphopheaven What i can do? i live in another state and I will protect it if I have to. Can't fight for Palestine!

@hiphopheaven That means that what if the same arguments is fit on the other side of the argument ( the same shoe on the other foot ) or switch sides with same arguments.

@hiphopheaven As I said if a Palestinian stays in front of armed Israeli and his life is threatened - Palestinian has the right to defend himself and shoot right?

What if the shoe is on the other foot? With women, with children, with sick, with old? What Israeli has to do ?

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl As I said in order to limit the bloodshed I support Palestine state, because the Palestinians cant be ruled from Israeli government, but I do not condone the kidnappings of civilian people. If there is a men in front of you with a gun ... defend your self, but if there is an unarmed men, women and children and you are the one with the gun I'm against that! And this man with this gun in front of women and children do not deserve any support ... whatever the cause!

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl Explain to me how do you call "armed resistance" with men with guns against women and children ? I understand ( I do not condone ) "armed resistance" warrior vs warrior, but kidnapping and killing civilians ... i do not.

@Walter8100000 @randahl "Friendly" visit to Taiwan ?

@randahl Can you imagine how deep in is he since he asked China for help and said he will delay the meeting with Xi if they don't help.

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl What do you expect EU to do? EU was betrayed by USA, and left alone to pick up the pieces in Ukraine. Because of WW2 there is no coherent army in EU and if it was not for de Gaulle, EU would not have nukes. As I said I do support Palestine, but I do not support the actions that Hezbollah is doing to kidnap civilians and kill them. You can't seek for diplomatic support with barbaric actions.

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl I agree that Palestine has to have a state. Palestinians can't be ruled by Israelis. But do you know that EU exports twice as much to Israel than it imports. What good it will do for the Palestinians if EU do not sell to Israel ? But still after all the flaws. Which state is better than EU ? Why do I have to answer to you and you don't answer to me ? As I said EU is not perfect, but I can't think of anyone better.

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl How much do you know about war crimes ? And do you know who are Thomas Dyilo, Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic ? And once again I will ask my question ... who is better than EU ( which is not perfect ) to respect human rights ?

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl For starters it is the only player that mostly respect Chapter 7 of UN, and one of the few players that got a member state sent former president in jail ( not politically ) for corruption ( even for a week ) and respect most of the human rights of all players. This is something that can't be said for the other players. Which do you think tops EU on this criteria ?

@hiphopheaven @adamvs1 @randahl I didn't said EU is a saint law abiding player, but the player who plays most by the law of all other players in this theater.

@adamvs1 @randahl We have no choice. EU is the only legitimate player on the stage that still respect law more than the other players. So we have no other choice to switch from USA to EU on that matter. And you know without law is every man for himself and back to the jungle free-for-all.

@adamvs1 @randahl I'm not convinced they can achieve this, because yeah now if you are looking at EU it does not have military and sovereignty and etc., but what are the alternatives? That's why I think that this is a big opportunity for EU to break the chains and live up to its potential of a global power by create its own join military, extends its partnerships with democracies and keep distance from the USA until it become a democracy again.

@randahl Still I don't understand it.
After the WW2 the deck was stacked against the world in USA favor.
Now Trump is destroying all its leverage.
Who is the bigger looser ?

@dansup Switch to Session, FOSS, Desktop + Mobile apps, no phone number needed, no corporations behind, no governments.