Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

hcschuetz@mastodon.socialH

hcschuetz@mastodon.social

@hcschuetz@mastodon.social
About
Posts
2
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Another 3D-printing suggestion from Colm Mulcahy:
    hcschuetz@mastodon.socialH hcschuetz@mastodon.social

    @sibrosan @divbyzero

    I think I did get your point. There are differences in weight/volume with planar cuts. (And the diffs are small for thin shells and get bigger for thick shells.)

    But these differences go away *completely* with the conic cuts.

    Uncategorized

  • Another 3D-printing suggestion from Colm Mulcahy:
    hcschuetz@mastodon.socialH hcschuetz@mastodon.social

    @sibrosan @divbyzero

    With a thin shell the slopes of the slicing surfaces are negligible.

    With a thicker shell (outer diameter D and inner diameter d) such a surface should have a slope such that the outer edges have vertical distance D/n and the inner edges have vertical distance d/n. Thus a slicing surface is a part of a cone with its apex at the center of the spheres. This way the slices should have the same weight again.

    Edit: Ok, I was too slow. You already wrote essentially the same.

    Uncategorized
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups