@bragefuglseth @TheEvilSkeleton If you do decide to write one (or one about distro-packaging in general), feel free to send me a message, I have an additional argument that I'm happy to share (I don't want to share it before, it would ruin the fun :)).
F
finefindus@floss.social
@finefindus@floss.social
Posts
-
The Linux desktop has a maintenance problem due to the lack of volunteer contributors. -
The Linux desktop has a maintenance problem due to the lack of volunteer contributors.@leniwcowaty @TheEvilSkeleton @linuxmint @nekohayo I doubt it, considering they are explicitly asked to change branding.
Once again there is also a difference between having 'GNOME Calendar' with a link to the GNOME issuetracker and a forked 'Mint Calendar' which has a credit line in the about section. -
The Linux desktop has a maintenance problem due to the lack of volunteer contributors.@leniwcowaty @TheEvilSkeleton @linuxmint @nekohayo There is a difference between shipping outdated packages and offloading your issues to upstream. Distributions can (and should) ship outdated software with changed branding.
> You have NO RIGHT to request removal of a package
Statements like this make me seriously question whether I should publish any of my work under an open source license, which I think is a rather sad thing
