F
You know that painstaking, standard-looking format for a merge request that LLMs like to generate?
Summary
Motivation
Implementation
Files changed
Usage
Patch
Am I being unkind in ascribing LLM usage due to *that* format? If LLMs didn't exist and a person had written that, I would say, well, how organized and kind of them. But I know no one writes MRs like that, and I feel conflicted about that being my main source of suspicion.
I'm pretty sure someone sent another LLM-generated patch to librsvg. It's for a feature in rsvg-convert that I don't want, so I explained my rationale as kindly as I could.
But the code is very subtly wrong. I did not comment on the code at all.
@MikeGorse oh, the machine is fine; it's the one Suse sent me last year. It's a big and heavy fuckin' brick, but plenty fast. I wish the SSD were bigger, but I think it's easy to replace or add a second one.
LLVM crashes! prints a stack trace! compiler bug!
My hard disk: 27 KB left.
@frew what a nice chair!!!
