Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

emmatonkin@mstdn.socialE

emmatonkin@mstdn.social

@emmatonkin@mstdn.social
About
Posts
3
Topics
0
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • the end of online anonymity?
    emmatonkin@mstdn.socialE emmatonkin@mstdn.social

    @JMMaok @UlrikeHahn

    Honestly, doing healthcare data, it has long seemed to me that
    a) anonymity is often so hard to achieve and there are so many likely near future risks that the term should be used only very sparingly, whereas it is thrown around like it is going out of fashion
    b) one can(should) have honest discussions during consent process about risk as one might for an image/photo release
    c) abusive secondary data analysis needs to be seen to have serious consequences

    Uncategorized

  • A review of the proceedings from four major computer-science conferences showed that none from 2021, and all from 2025, had fake citations.
    emmatonkin@mstdn.socialE emmatonkin@mstdn.social

    @petersuber
    This whole thing reminds me very much of RFC 3514.

    Well over two decades after the Evil Bit was first proposed (a one-bit security flag in IP v4 to indicate that a packet is sent with evil intent), we still see apparently malicious packets arriving at firewalls, yet these do *not* have the Evil Bit set. However, as the Evil Bit is not set, we cannot say with certainty whether these apparently malicious packets are, in fact, evil.

    Uncategorized misconduct scholcomm llms hallucinations

  • A review of the proceedings from four major computer-science conferences showed that none from 2021, and all from 2025, had fake citations.
    emmatonkin@mstdn.socialE emmatonkin@mstdn.social

    @petersuber "No author within our dataset acknowledged using AI to generate citations even though all four conference policies required it, indicating current policies are insufficient. "

    A very strange mystery indeed. Perhaps we should call Poirot in so he can point out the obvious answers on page 1, knock off work early and spend the rest of the book wandering around delicatessens tasting brands of hot chocolate, or something.

    Uncategorized misconduct scholcomm llms hallucinations
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups