@alda It recently auto-dubbed Barbara's Rabarberbar into English for me.
Auto-dubbing people speaking is horrendous, but auto-dubbing a literal song is even worse.
@alda It recently auto-dubbed Barbara's Rabarberbar into English for me.
Auto-dubbing people speaking is horrendous, but auto-dubbing a literal song is even worse.
@bagder If only they used more AI - 271 is child's play compared to what those AI could do.
Shower thought of the day: Could you make a nitroglycerin powered engine?
@krans Thinking of your example, surely that's not automatically decideable?
context1
-irrelevant1
-old
+new
+irrelevant2
context2
Should the output become
context1
irrelevant1
new
irrelevant2
context2
or
context1
new
irrelevant1
irrelevant2
context2
?
or any other potential resultant output?
@krans Right, that's not a thing regexes can do. I was expecting something to be wrong still but couldn't quite find what. I'm also somewhat sure the header lines would be wrong in counts, which is also not fixable in regex.
Best of luck!
@krans 2nd regex does do that? That's why I prefix the !KeEp to those you want to keep, so I can then remove the +/- from the rest. Should replace with space though, lemme fix that
@krans I did kinda expect that and yeah, that context is unregexable
@whitequark ... I like the way you're thinking.