CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@n0toose @Codeberg there's always subtle interpretation to such posts so certain sentences might be interpreted differently.

We'd be happy to have a positive relationship with @Codeberg and possibly other future forges which promote an open ecosystem and @forgejo.

We believe it would beneficial it people wouldn't jump from one big instance to the next but that there would rather be a real base for federation. So the actual goal should be to push more "small" instances to become medium ones. And give them some presence. And ideally there would be more than just us, so federation does actually have a practical and not just theoretical future.

@n0toose @Codeberg

Not sure what your goal is and why you must comment in a negative way on almost all posts in which users mention us in a positive way.

We don't need a marketing strategy as we don't aim to monetize anything. We only aim to cover costs and make effective use of the money for proper hardware. Maybe something Codeberg could think more about as well
And given Codeberg's supreme ethics, we are even more confuded about such teasing replies. But you're surely have your reasons.

We didn't really put emphasis on this topic (hardware, speed, overall deployment professionalism) yet, but if you're asking us to make clearer where the differences to Codeberg are, we can also push on this more

@thomas @Codeberg

Just to state the obvious: we also like to host public repos and serving one's primary forge