CIRCLE WITH A DOT

@TarkabarkaHolgy That sounds like a really tough situation to be in. I actually was reading a pretty good article the other day and stopped reading because it used the "not only this - but also " technique about 2/3rds of the way down the page, because I figured it was ai! Now I wonder if I did the author, and myself, a disservice.

I can't quite put my finger on it, but it's as if the models are so sycophantic that it's made that particular technique feel like a literary accosting of my intelligence and time.

This is what I mean when I tell people there is going to be a market again for human proofed repositories of various media and information. If I could have complete trust in the website or author it wouldn't be a big deal, but how we even build that trust? Especially in America, where sadly, if there isn't profit it seemingly is not worth doing, and a cynical nature is a fundamental part of ones daily defense against the onslot of low quality media we have to deal with in our lives every day.

@foone Where I work it's all the directions, and just for fun there are even a few I'm pretty sure the scientists haven't even discovered yet.

@MLE_online You may be right, but shaming people into conservation is a losing strategy when the only winning strategy is who we vote for.

No amount of personal conservation is going to get us out of the mess we are making. That only resides in the domain of government and frankly any other discussions aren't helpful. They were 30 years ago, but not anymore, at least outside of learning how to be a generally well rounded, good person as you grow up.

@SecureOwl I disagree, I see nothing about COCAINE!!