B
@petealexharris @carnage4life I'm going to say (perhaps hope) that the goal of the California bill is not ironclad compliance. Instead it is about satisfying a social concern, while minimizing overhead and protecting privacy.
As far as I'm concerned, if a parent can just say a kid is 16, that's good enough. It would be a much worse world if a parent actually had to prove it.
And if a kid admins his own system, that's on him too.
@pier what do you mean by project? Are you suddenly making a rule that every bash man page, that was intended to be read by a bash user, cannot be read by this kind of mechanical bash user?
Or are you saying that some past answer to someone's bash problem, which we all understood could be useful to other bash users, cannot be used by this kind of bash user?
Why wouldn't I want *my* answers to reach as many people as possible?
@GossiTheDog someone criticized the press recently, saying that if they are still trying to present logical reasons for Trump's actions, that itself is an irrational behavior.
It's all so sad. And I feel as a US citizen I have no control over it. We picked up this this phrase "sane washing" but never solved the problem.
The irrational drive policy, and the irrational justify it.
If I ask Gemini to convert a 20 line fish script I wrote into bash, who exactly did I steal from? That new 20 line bash script doesn't exist anywhere else in the world.
I think non-practitioners are getting on a different page than practitioners, because they don't understand how these things are really being used.
