@jamesb192 @pluralistic A 'people-only' free software license, that didn't extend rights to corporations or bots, would meet the Open Source definition
B
brunopostle@mastodon.xyz
@brunopostle@mastodon.xyz
Posts
-
The Supreme Court has just turned down a petition to hear an appeal in a case that held that AI works can't be copyrighted. -
The Supreme Court has just turned down a petition to hear an appeal in a case that held that AI works can't be copyrighted.@pluralistic I had a thought, which is kind-of tangential to this thread, that it is *very* weird that we all automatically assume the rights granted by free software licenses should be granted to non-humans: https://mastodon.xyz/@brunopostle/115552718550139735