@lukeratta @atpfm Fair points. But I didn’t say the no subscription purchase mean loss of all profitable. A company like Apple wants to make 40% so they save money by making one SKU and their modeling calculates that if 20% of users do subscribe they make 40% profit.
blazesanders@techhub.social
@blazesanders@techhub.social
Posts
-
688: A Company Manhttps://atp.fm/688 -
688: A Company Manhttps://atp.fm/688@lukeratta @atpfm but they would need to charge EVERYONE more money, if they wanted fewer SKU’s. The few people that want / need higher the spec help pay for the people that can’t afford it.
-
688: A Company Manhttps://atp.fm/688I’m ok with locking hardware features behind software, since it’s often cheaper (and faster which makes company more money) to have fewer product SKU since assembly line doesn’t have to be swapped / reconfigured.
These savings can sometimes be passed down to users.