Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA

argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

@argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
About
Posts
8
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

View Original

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • the hunt
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @exocomics

    As a cat person, I can confirm that this is very cat.

    Uncategorized

  • Why does the aft part of the Galaxy-class bridge not have any chairs?
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    Why does the aft part of the Galaxy-class bridge not have any chairs?

    Poor Worf, having to be on his feet standing in place all the time. Even the bridge officers on Klingon ships don't have to put up with that.

    #StarTrek #StarTrekTNG

    Uncategorized startrek startrektng

  • #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @fluidlogic

    Hmm? I don't understand. Those are both 32-bit machines.

    Uncategorized retrocomputing

  • #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @Su_G

    You did miss out. It was an exciting time.

    @fluidlogic

    Uncategorized retrocomputing

  • #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @rogerparkinson

    Windows 2.1 and later aren't entirely 16-bit. Apps run in real mode and use 20-bit segmented addressing, but if it's running on a 386 or later then the kernel will run 32-bit and map pages in and out of the 20-bit address space in response to GlobalLock calls.

    But you'd have to wait until 1993 to get a Windows in which apps can directly use 32-bit addressing. That's when NT 3.1 and Win32s (a shim to run 32-bit code on regular Windows 3.1) came out.

    @fluidlogic

    Uncategorized retrocomputing

  • #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @wollman

    Did you replace the system board at any point? As far as I know, the 5150 BIOS doesn't know how to boot from a hard drive.

    @fluidlogic

    Uncategorized retrocomputing

  • #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @silvermoon82

    You could have upgraded it to a 486. Not a Pentium, though—Pentium motherboards were ATX and needed the case to provide a soft power button.

    As far as I know, nothing much changed after that, so you could put modern hardware in a Pentium-era case…although you might need to drill some extra vent holes in it and add some more fans!

    @fluidlogic

    Uncategorized retrocomputing

  • #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.
    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

    @fluidlogic

    I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

    The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

    Uncategorized retrocomputing
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups