@adamshostack +1 on letting the author know first. I’d be honored by the contact and grateful for the correction.
0xd0ug@infosec.exchange
@0xd0ug@infosec.exchange
Posts
-
Academic friends, if a PhD thesis starts with a factually wrong representation of your work, do you -
Please nitpick the following (or suggest an authority, such as NIST or CISA )@adamshostack Another nitpick: consider changing “gain” to “reach” or “achieve”.
I agree with Prof. @mattblaze about “weaponize”. It’s my preferred alternative, but his suggestion “fieldable” works fine. Also consider “operational” or “operationalized” as alternatives closer to “weaponized”.