Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Over half of children's care providers are owned by private equity or sovereign wealth funds;

Over half of children's care providers are owned by private equity or sovereign wealth funds;

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
politics
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
    chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
    chrismayla6@zirk.us
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Over half of children's care providers are owned by private equity or sovereign wealth funds;

    last year expenditure rose by around 20% partly due to an increase in service use; partly due to price rises;

    as utilisation of services is driven by local authorities' legal requirements, the providers have found a stream of income that is not dependent on 'market conditions' but rather is driven by diagnosis & rising recognition of need.

    No wonder such investments are popular.

    #politics
    h/t FT

    geofcox@climatejustice.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

      Over half of children's care providers are owned by private equity or sovereign wealth funds;

      last year expenditure rose by around 20% partly due to an increase in service use; partly due to price rises;

      as utilisation of services is driven by local authorities' legal requirements, the providers have found a stream of income that is not dependent on 'market conditions' but rather is driven by diagnosis & rising recognition of need.

      No wonder such investments are popular.

      #politics
      h/t FT

      geofcox@climatejustice.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      geofcox@climatejustice.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
      geofcox@climatejustice.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @ChrisMayLA6

      I'm reminded of the 2020 scandal over the Southern Cross care homes - worth repeating as an object lesson in why care should not be in the investment-driven private sector at all.

      Blackstone (American private equity) owned both the Southern Cross operating company and NHP - Southern Cross' biggest landlord. Blackstone's Business Model in fact involved selling Southern Cross care homes to NHP and leasing them back on exploitative terms, and indeed tampering with existing leases so that Southern Cross became committed to rent rises every year for 35 years. Having 'created' all that future 'value' in NHP, Blackstone promptly sold it for more than twice what they paid less than 3 years earlier. The care homes then had to raise prices - and keep raising them. Investors - mainly outside the UK - got guaranteed profits; UK people (and moreover public sector care purchasers) got to choose between higher prices (or taxes), or worse care. Or both.

      chrismayla6@zirk.usC linuxgnome@todon.euL 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      0
      • geofcox@climatejustice.socialG geofcox@climatejustice.social

        @ChrisMayLA6

        I'm reminded of the 2020 scandal over the Southern Cross care homes - worth repeating as an object lesson in why care should not be in the investment-driven private sector at all.

        Blackstone (American private equity) owned both the Southern Cross operating company and NHP - Southern Cross' biggest landlord. Blackstone's Business Model in fact involved selling Southern Cross care homes to NHP and leasing them back on exploitative terms, and indeed tampering with existing leases so that Southern Cross became committed to rent rises every year for 35 years. Having 'created' all that future 'value' in NHP, Blackstone promptly sold it for more than twice what they paid less than 3 years earlier. The care homes then had to raise prices - and keep raising them. Investors - mainly outside the UK - got guaranteed profits; UK people (and moreover public sector care purchasers) got to choose between higher prices (or taxes), or worse care. Or both.

        chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
        chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
        chrismayla6@zirk.us
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @GeofCox

        Thanks for the reminder - boosted!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • geofcox@climatejustice.socialG geofcox@climatejustice.social

          @ChrisMayLA6

          I'm reminded of the 2020 scandal over the Southern Cross care homes - worth repeating as an object lesson in why care should not be in the investment-driven private sector at all.

          Blackstone (American private equity) owned both the Southern Cross operating company and NHP - Southern Cross' biggest landlord. Blackstone's Business Model in fact involved selling Southern Cross care homes to NHP and leasing them back on exploitative terms, and indeed tampering with existing leases so that Southern Cross became committed to rent rises every year for 35 years. Having 'created' all that future 'value' in NHP, Blackstone promptly sold it for more than twice what they paid less than 3 years earlier. The care homes then had to raise prices - and keep raising them. Investors - mainly outside the UK - got guaranteed profits; UK people (and moreover public sector care purchasers) got to choose between higher prices (or taxes), or worse care. Or both.

          linuxgnome@todon.euL This user is from outside of this forum
          linuxgnome@todon.euL This user is from outside of this forum
          linuxgnome@todon.eu
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @GeofCox @ChrisMayLA6

          Oxford University accepted £150m from the CEO of Blackstone for the Schwarzman Humanities Centre = that's where we are. It was opened last year and has an open event soon. Dreadful.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups