The Society of Authors (UK) is helping launch this: an identifier for human-authored (i.e. non-AI) books: https://humanauthored.co.uk/

[burningtyger@nrw.social]

@cstross That image accompanying the toot looks very much AI authored to me

[cstross@wandering.shop]

@burningTyger Yes: but if you click through, the original larger image looks a bit more plausible. Except it's greyed-out until the website fully goes live in a few hours. If it *is* AI generated, then the potential for blowback is enormous.

[sassinake@mastodon.social]

@cstross

we shouldn't have to pay some org to get a document to certify our humanity.

[npars01@mstdn.social]

@cstross

Really looking forward to the AI bubble bursting.

AI will hurt the economy before it helps it. Here’s what comes after, according to Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz | Fortune

The short-term pain is real, and we are not ready for it. The long-term picture, Stiglitz argues, is something else entirely.

Fortune (fortune.com)

Just a moment...

(beth-kindig.medium.com)

Access Denied

(www.cnbc.com)

forbes.com

(www.forbes.com)

https://archive.is/t1Z5l
https://www.ft.com/content/a4c4dcf8-7a73-4912-9739-c94714985bfd

The AI bubble will pop. It’s up to us to replace it responsibly | Mark Surman

When bubbles burst, what comes next can be better, if we build it differently

the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

Blinking New Warning Sign Appears for AI Industry

Fears over an AI bubble continue to grow as analysts warn that companies are massively overinvesting, according to a new survey.

Futurism (futurism.com)

AI companies will fail. We can salvage something from the wreckage | Cory Doctorow

AI is asbestos in the walls of our tech society, stuffed there by monopolists run amok. A serious fight against it must strike at its roots

the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

[burningtyger@nrw.social]

@cstross What's all that supposed to be? Chairs winding through the room? Two tables floating into one, the girl reading stuff on the table in the front while hers is empty? A weird lokking box with a plant on it that grows into the table and a chair next to it? This is AI generated.

[digicom@mastodon.art]

@cstross

The original image is not marked as AI:

https://www.freepik.com/premium-photo/smiling-woman-is-enjoying-herself-cozy-cafe-while-savoring-hot-beverage-aig58_260988593.htm

But most of the images on that profile with that topic are:

 

(www.freepik.com)

[cstross@wandering.shop]

@burningTyger My eyesight isn't good enough to examine images. (I'm awaiting cataract surgery in one eye and am half-blind in the other.)

[scaletheory@mastodon.social]

@cstross

What's this say about society?

I thought "made with real cheese" or "no artificial flavors" was bad. Why we making fake cheese anyway... profits for stock investors...

Always fighting against evil we are.

[wordshaper@weatherishappening.network]

@Npars01 @cstross I'd say the current wave of AI investment is the greatest misallocation of resources in human history but I suspect we could legit Homer Simpson that one because I have faith in humanity that we can misallocate even *more* resources in the future somehow.

[lazarou@mastodon.social]

@cstross "aaaaaand they used AI-generated artwork"

jfc, they had ONE job....

[datarama@hachyderm.io]

@cstross This is how they get us.

Writers would never use AI-generated slop writing, but they'll happily use AI-generated slop imagery.
Artists would never use AI-generated slop imagery, but they'll happily display art to AI-generated slop music.
Musicians would never use AI-generated slop music, but they'll happily use AI-generated slop writing for lyrics.

(And nobody cares about AI-generated slop code.)

[cassolotl@eldritch.cafe]

@cstross

> EDIT: aaaaaand they used AI-generated artwork ‍️

That AI illustration isn't visible on their website now, so I assume it was a mistake and they removed it when they noticed.

[ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu]

@datarama @cstross I wish I could say that people cared about slop code, but too many devs are showing just how little they care about the quality of their work.

[unkx@icosahedron.website]

@Lazarou @cstross the had ONE job and they decided to outsource it to slop machines ‍️

[datarama@hachyderm.io]

@ainmosni @cstross I mean, I do - but I know I'm very much swimming against the stream here, and also the stream is full of piranhas.

[meganl@mas.to]

@cstross Unfortunately I've seen this a lot - authors using AI artwork based on theft while decrying theft of their writing....

It's more of leopards eating faces, I guess...

#FuckAI

[pseudonym@mastodon.online]

@Lazarou @cstross

Ouch! The irony, it burns!

[ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu]

@datarama @cstross I do as well, and everyone in my bubble does as well, but then again, I've also been picky about my bubble, and I'm assuming the worst from outside it.

[lemmus@social.vivaldi.net]

@ainmosni @datarama @cstross

_My_ field requires human finesse and insight, but those other fields are perfectly well served with AI slop. Which makes it really fascinating how many developers willingly destroy their code bases with slop. (Some are forced to, but many enough do it eagerly and willingly...) (Yes, I'm a developer. Yes, I refuse to work with genAI.)

[datarama@hachyderm.io]

@Lemmus @ainmosni @cstross I'm in that boat too, but I think it's a matter of time before I'm pushed out of the industry (inasmuch as the industry survives at all).